优秀英语论文参考:欧盟的对外贸易政策 [2]
论文作者:英语论文论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2014-09-15编辑:yangcheng点击率:15143
论文字数:4338论文编号:org201409141229336580语种:英语 English地区:美国价格:免费论文
关键词:欧盟对外贸易政策自由贸易European UnionEconomics Essay
摘要:本文是一篇欧盟的对外贸易政策的相关论文,本文主要论述了内部和外部刺激使得欧洲联盟(EU)的对外贸易政策转向了自由贸易的方向。研究的主要论点是, 在世界贸易组织的多边贸易体制下,欧盟积极主动的作用受到两个因素的影响。
of the Single Market Program for the attainment of the completed internal market of free movement of goods, labour, capital and services, would enable better exploitation of economies of scale by and tougher competition among the member states, and these would improve the competitiveness of European producers in relation to others (Kokko et al.2005:12).
In the next section I employ the European integration theories: rational-choice and historical institutionalism to explain the choice and path-dependence of the Member States (MS) in free trade: the rational choice of delegating trade policy-making to the EU level obstruct an easy reversal of the initial and relative gains of this path increase over time (Pierson 2000:252), to demonstrate the EU MS dependence in the free trade path. Such an approach converges with the Ricardo’s comparative advantage theory, and Heckschler-Ohlin model to elucidate the EU’s active role in the global trade liberalization under WTO then. Basing on these theories, I argue that the institutional design of EU trade policy-making, and European transnational business responses to the pressures of globalization (Apeldoorn in Stubbs & Underhill 2006:308) reflect that MS choose the supranational representation of their individual international trade interests: if they are faced with a choice between free trade and protecting a security interest, and if a large proportion of the electorate (business groups supporting the states) is employed in globally competitive industries, the MS will choose free trade (Simon 2005:401).
When it comes to the third section, the theory comparative advantage and Heckschler - Ohlin model as its element explain the rationale of the EU to promote free trade globally: a country gains by exporting the good in which it has a comparative advantage and by importing the good in whicih it has a comparative disadvantage (Coughlin et al. in Frieden & Lake 2000:304), and the advantageous exchange and specialization in these goods increase national wealth. Therefore, differences in factors of production such as land, labor and capital (Ricardo in Crane&Amawi 1997:72) lead to differences in prices of goods; improving this simple approach, Heckscher-Ohlin model focuses on the issues of proportionality of factors of production for goods: a labour-rich country exports labour-intensive goods and a capital-rich country exports capital-intensive goods (Hart & Prakash in Frieden & Lake 2000:184). Therefore, comparative advantage in this situation can be driven from exporting the goods of abundant production factor. The objective in pursuing this way, is the matter of ‘’constant returns to scale’’ (Gilpin 2001:206), which says that by pursuing the H-O model, the state will earn substantial gains the more it exports and consequently be interested in enlarging the scale of the production of these goods the more it earns. Furthermore, the Stolper-Samuelson model’s argument is worth to mention that the change in price of a product would increase the return to the abundant factor, and thus the real incomes of owners of this factor will rise: an increase in the price of the labor-intensive good leads to an increase in the real wage rate of labor throughout the economy and an increase in the real incomes of laborers (Alt & Gilligan in Frieden & Lake 2000:330), and this partly explains the pressures of the EU transnational business interests pressures for tr
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。