英语论文网

t undermined, all can operate in a synergistic manner to achieve an organization’s goals.
　　2. 3次
　　老师是应该鼓励学生挑战现有流行的观点还是应该接受它们
　　考古：
　　V1. the best teachers are those who encourage the students to challenge popular ideas rather than accepting popular ideas.
　　V2. 最好的老师会expect 学生challenge ideas
　　V3 Some people think that the best teachers should expect students to
　　感谢 sherry717xxm提供的思路
　　开篇就说我的观点是两种的compromise，挑战权威或主流思想固然重要但是最好的老师应属那种generally鼓励学生创新但是又不一味单纯强调不接受所有这种思想
　　P1.鼓励学生挑战……老师有助于在学生最好的学习的年华develop他们critical & creative thinking,而这些又是科技不断进步的最重要因素
　　P2.鼓励学生挑战……的老师可以建立良好的teacher-student relationship，更加促进学习研究的ambience
　　P3.但是这种鼓励是有条件的，不能什么理论观点都让学生们去挑战吧，要不就成了找茬，而且会浪费很多资源和时间
　　最后再来个总结
　　因为其实我是很想一边倒的，但是觉得还是大正小负或者大负小正这样写比较显得立体
　　 3.
　　 people are more likely be leader are those who can perform the same tasks as he or she want the other want to do 之类的
　　原题：No.33 “People are likely to accept as a leader only someone who has demonstrated an ability to perform the same tasks that he or she expects others to perform.”
　　思路：
　　人们不会尊重一个不能完成他要求别人完成的任务自己却不能完成的领导。这是人之常情，人们通常都只会欣赏和尊敬比自己优秀的人，而不喜欢被一个不能完成任务却命令自己去做的人心存敬意。例如克林顿总统当commander-in-chief 的时候，由于众所周知他曾经逃避兵役，很自然的下级军官和士兵都不是很尊重他。
　　人们不信任一个自己完不成任务却要求别人去完成的人。仍然举克林顿总统的例子。由于他逃兵役被视为没有能力，下级都对他的决策心存怀疑，这也就潜在的导致了执行上的不尽心不尽力。
　　诚然是否能完成自己交给别人的任务并不是衡量一个leader重要指标。可能领导能力、,组织能力、运筹能力更为重要，但是我们不能忽视人们心理上的看法，尽管它可能并不合理但它确实是存在的。
　　normal human feelings admire adore respect superior to evade escape military service subordinate soldier be doubtful of be suspicious of execution implement admittedly true potentially evaluate index leadership psychological psychology psychological psychologist exist subsist ...in ... serves as a fitting and public example
　　诚然，如果在其领导的领域内几乎一窍不通，一个领导很难得到下属的信任和支持，会被看作layperson. 比如，人们无法想象一个不具备任何电脑知识的人，该如何领导一个庞大的IT企业，比如MICROSOFT在激烈的市场中竞争。
　　但是，这是否意味着作为领导，必须要有能力完成每一项他要求下属做的事呢?这个问题，与领导和员工的真正作用有很大关系!首先，领导的职责是制定长期的发展方针，并且保证这个方针的贯彻执行，adhere to their strategic plans不被偏离。组织员工共同合作完成任务。on the other hand, 员工的作用是各司其职，更加具体的specific task.
　　从以上两种职责不难看出，领导与员工起到significantly different functions，让领导完成每一个subordinate要做的工作，unfair的。比如，不能blame a CEO for lacking the skills of typing。要对下属做的事有很好的了解，但不一定都要做。否则，领导就失去了意义，成为了一个全能的工人。omnipotent worker with all kinds of skills.
　　View1: It is human nature to admire then follow someone who is more competent than themselves.
　　View2: But a feature of a good leader is to organize people with different specialties together and let them perform as a whole. It is too ideal to expect the leaders to have all the specialties of his subordinates.
　　范文：
　　People are more likely to accept the leadership of those who have shown they can perform the same tasks they require of others. My reasons for this view involve the notions of respect and trust.
　　It is difficult for people to fully respect a leader who cannot, or will not, do what he or she asks of others. President Clinton’s difficulty in his role as Commander-in-Chief serves as a fitting and very public example. When Clinton assumed this leadership position, it was well known that he had evaded military service during the Vietnam conflict. Military leaders and lower-level personnel alike made it clear that they did not respect his leadership as a result. Contrast the Clinton case with that of a business leader such as John Chambers, CEO of Cisco Systems, who by way of his training and experience as a computer en