英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

中马产品责任比较研究

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:职称论文 Scholarship Papers登出时间:2012-04-24编辑:lena ding点击率:10550

论文字数:2654论文编号:org201204241017283857语种:英语 English地区:马来西亚价格:免费论文

关键词:legislative modelthe main body of the product liability

摘要:中国与马来西亚互为对方的主要贸易国,双方贸易往来日趋频繁。为有效地保障两国的消费者权益,两国均对产品责任进行立法。将从产品责任立法模式、产品责任主体、产品责任归责原则以及产品责任损害赔偿范围等方面,对两国责任法进行比较分析。

Abstract: China and Malaysia each other's major trading countries, both sides trade is becoming more frequent. In order to effectively protect the interests of consumers between the two countries, both China and the product liability legislation. From the legislative model of product liability, product liability the main principle of Product Liability and Product Liability Damage compensation range, a comparative analysis of the two countries' Liability Act.

 

Keywords: legislative model; the main body of the product liability;

 

Product Liability Principle and product liability damages
Product liability is a product does not meet the standard, express or implied, (should be) or the existence of dangerous or defective Erzhi loss, borne by the producers or civil liability. In today's market, the product increased, damage resulting accident also continue to occur. To this end, China and Malaysia, two countries were constantly updating the product liability legislation, in order to find the best balance between the consumer and market development. This paper will systematically analyze the commonality and individuality of the product liability law in the two countries and to study the lack of.

 

Legislative Model
1.1 between the two countries existing product liability legislation
At present, China and Malaysia has entered the implementation phase of the second round of product liability legislation, the legislative model also protect consumers mode to balance mode, some potential problems to make the guidelines. "Tort Liability Act and the Consumer Protection Act 1999 for the latest product liability legislation in China and Malaysia.
1.2 China's legislative model
China's legislation began in 1986 to develop the "Civil Law", and ultimately be determined in the "Product Quality Law" system. Content of the legislative process, legislators, the main reference of the second restatement "of the U.S. tort law and the EU Product Liability Directive, which" American tort law, the second restatement of "the blueprint for our product liability legislation, the product manufacturing and sellers subject to strict liability is to learn from the achievements of the Act.
The product liability provisions of the Tort Liability Act on the basis of adhering to the above legislative model, drawing on the German product liability legislation, the introduction of some important concepts, such as tracking the observed defects.
Legislative background and mode of 1.3 Malaysia's product liability
Product liability in the Malaysian judicial use, mainly in two ways: jurisprudence of judicial and statutory law. Since 1807 Royal judicial Charter (the Royal Charter of Justice, 1807) since 1807 in Penang, Malaysia, the British law was officially (Malaysia), and has been affected so far. Based on this, the traditional product liability, the administration of justice often has a strong color of case law.
Until the 1990s, with the products on the Malaysian market, and the resulting product damage issues have become increasingly prominent. For such a new phenomenon, due to the lack of effective or targeted jurisprudence, consumers often can not get effective relief. Insufficient to make up the jurisprudence, the 1999 Consumer Protection Act (Consumer Protection Act, 1999) adjustment of product liability legislation in the form of codification. Part of the Act 2010 Consumer Protection Amendment Act "(论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/3 页首页上一页123下一页尾页

相关文章

    英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非