魁北克文化前途未卜 [2]
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:议论文 Argument Essay登出时间:2015-05-15编辑:xiaoni2000点击率:5734
论文字数:2014论文编号:org201505121613239081语种:英语 English地区:加拿大价格:免费论文
关键词:魁北克文化美国前途未卜Quebec Culture
摘要:本文是一篇加拿大留学生论文,主要讨论了魁北克文化的现状及发展趋势。
eighties. (Tremblay, 1992) Upon further analysis, Tremblay points to the policies that are in place, and claims they cause the high amount of production. This leads him to further his call for more policies. However, this is simply not the case when you look at other parts of Canada that have roughly the same policy. The Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has a fixed quota at 60% of television content must be Canadian, for English Canada, but this does not cause a rise in the production of Canadian content. (Donaldson, 1970) Tremblay is clearly picking and choosing the facts and interpreting them in his own way. Later in the article, he even admits that if American content reached 50% on Quebec airwaves it would not constitute an all out invasion. (Tremblay, 1992)
In the next part of the article, Tremblay discusses the viewer preferences of the Quebecois. Tremblay says, “The Quebecois, like Canadians insist that they have quick and easy access to American content”. The Quebecois clearly want access to the content. When something is wanted and not forced upon, it cannot be classified as an invasion, as Tremblay has done. “Communications in Quebec is distinctive in that Quebec there is the existence of two competing media serving different culture but yet they both still reinforce the character of Quebec .”(Tremblay, 1998) Tremblay said this himself, a few years later in an article published in 1998. Even with the airing of American content the French culture is still being served. As long as the Quebecois are being served, it nullifies any invasion.
In the final part of Tremblay's article, he takes a look at how Americans like to export there television shows for syndication in other parts of the world. Tremblay claims that when Americans export there shows, they do it in a nature that undercuts new Canadian production. Broadcast rights for a show will cost only about $150 000 but if the same show was to be produced in Canada it would require millions of dollars. (Pacom, 2001) At these prices, it undercuts Canadian content significantly, since it becomes immensely cheaper to flood the airwaves with American content than it would be to produce new Canadian content. This is the only credible threat to the Canadian and Quebecois cultures. On the other hand, Quebec does produce 75% of its own content. (Tremblay, 1992) Even with the U.S undercutting, there is still a significant amount of Quebecois content on the air and content does not necessarily mean viewer ship. The undercutting of Canadian content is the most significant point that Tremblay is able to make, but as we see can see it is not as strong as Tremblay would like it to be.
True to his cause, Tremblay wrote this article in a manner that picked and chose facts that supported his point view on the topic. Upon further investigation, we have seen that most of the facts that he chose to trot out, do not stand up or they can be interpreted in other ways. Tremblay also drew a lot of false assumptions from the facts that were presented, by showing
statistics that said the Quebec airwaves were flooded with American produced content but production does necessarily mean viewer ship, since 8 of the top 10 shows in Quebec are produced in Quebec . (Pacom, 2001)
At certain points, the article also loses some of its appeal to sympathizers due to Tremblay's fear mongering and exaggerati
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。