英语论文网

Introduction
Through the whole 20th century, quantitative research is always the mainstream of the research methods while the qualitative research is on the verge of the research methods. There are so many differences between quantitative research and qualitative research in terms of theoretical basis, research methodology and the relationship between researchers and correspondents. The Education留学生教育论文代写 is kind of complicated culture. Educational research should combine both quantitative research and qualitative research together. In this essay, it will discuss two methodologies using in educational research and their effects in the research, and the key words applied in the quality research in educational research. The essay will firstly review and discuss the typical educational research methodology and its related methods, detect the effectiveness and strength as well as shortness of the methodologies and the related methods in the educational research. And then, it will discuss on the different types of educational research paradigm, to detect and analyse the characteristics of the different types of educational research paradigm and discuss the strengths, shortness, effectiveness and appliance of the different educational research paradigms, as well as the differences between the different educational research paradigms in educational perspective. Following this, the essay will analyse and discuss on the application of the educational research theories and its planed achievements on the academic research from educational research perspective. After that, it will detect and discuss the importance of ethics in academic research from the educational perspective. At the end of the essay, it will give a brief conclusion to summarize the major findings of the essay.   
The education research methodology and related methods

References
Barone, Tom. (2003). Changing the Educational Imaginary: Issues of Form, Substance. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(2), 202-217.
Barnbaum, Deborah R. and Byron, Michael. (2001). Research ethics: text and readings. New York: Prentice Hall. 
Barton, Keith C. (2006). Research methods in social studies education: contemporary issues and perspectives. New York: IAP. 
Comte, Auguste. (1855). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte. Translated by Martineau, Harriet. Paris: C. Blanchard.  
Creswell, John W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd edition), University of Nebraska-Lincoln: SAGE.
Dash, N.K. (1993). Research Paradigms in Education: Towards a Resolution. Journal of Indian Education, 19(2), 1-6.
Elliott, Deni and Stern, Judy E. (1997). Research ethics: a reader. New York: UPNE.
Gay, Lorrie R.,  Mills, Geoff E. and  Airasian, Peter W.  (2009). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (with My Education Lab) (9th Edition). New York: Prentice Hall.
Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed) Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 191-216.
Habermas, J. (1970). Knowledge and Human Interests (J. Shapiro.Trans.). London: Heinemann.
Herr, Kathryn & Anderson, Gary L. (1948). The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty. London: SAGE publications.
Holland, Janet, Blair, Maud and Shel本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。