英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

澳洲代写assignment:转换型领导在组织效能中难以捉摸的因素

论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2016-11-02编辑:wangwenxia点击率:13828

论文字数:3466论文编号:org201611012049028244语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:免费论文

关键词:Organizational Effectivene转换型领导澳洲代写assignment

摘要:本文的目标是探讨性状、变革型领导的领导风格对下属的影响(I)与上司的满意度,(II)总体满意度,(III)情感承诺、(IV)对工作压力的影响,(V)鼓舞和(VI)知识刺激。

本文的目标是探讨性状、变革型领导的领导风格对下属的影响(I)与上司的满意度,(II)总体满意度,(III)情感承诺、(IV)对工作压力的影响,(V)鼓舞和(VI)知识刺激。

长期以来,领导理论一直试图找到与有效领导相关的特征。可以说,大多数人认为,领导人可以对他们所领导的组织产生深远的影响。证据可以在报纸的体育版块,球迷和体育记者发现教练员更换主队,输球纪录增加,在商业新闻中有金融分析师推荐购买或出售股票,从而导致公司CEO转变的新闻,还有政治新闻,选民们要求重新选举或投票选举他们的代表的一种方式,从而提高他们的生活质量。尽管普遍的智慧对领导的影响,有相对较少的经验证据,来支持特定的领导风格和团队绩效之间的关系。领导人除了可能对小组有效性的影响外,领导者也可能影响小组成员的态度和感情。

Aims——目标

The aim of this paper is to explore the traits associated with transformational Leadership and the effects of this leadership style on subordinates in terms of (i)satisfaction with supervisor, (ii)overall satisfaction, (iii) affective commitment, (iv) impact on job related stress, (v) Inspirational motivation and (vi) Intellectual stimulation.

Introduction——简介

Leadership theory has long sought to find traits associated with effective leadership. It is safe to say that most people believe that leaders can have a profound impact on the organizations they lead. Supporting evidence can be found in newspapers' Sports sections where fans and sportswriters call for the replacement of coaches as a cure for the home team's losing record, in the Business press where financial analysts recommend the purchase or sale of stocks on news of CEO transitions, and in the Political press where voters are urged to re-elect or vote out their elected representatives as a way of improving their quality of life. Despite the common wisdom regarding the effects of leadership, there has been relatively little empirical evidence to support the relationship between specific leadership styles and group performance. In addition to the effects that leaders may have on the effectiveness of groups, leaders may also impact group members' attitudes and feelings. For instance, it may be more fun and satisfying to work for a sym pathetic, approachable leader than a person who leads by the use of intimidation and fear. Because of the link between job satisfaction, attitudes and turnover, several authors have noted the key role that leaders play in the retention of key employees (Kaye & Jordan, 1999; Harris & Brannick, 1999). The trait theory of leadership (a.k.a., the Great Man theory) has been a focus of scientific study for at least a century (e.g., Terman, 1904). Despite the long tradition of this research, the results of studies concern ing the relationship between traits and leadership have been inconsistent and disappointing. For instance, House and House & Aditya (1997) stated that 'there were few, if any, universal traits associated with effective leader ship . . . there developed among the community of leadership scholars near consensus that the search for universal traits was futile'.

There are many reasons to attend to the unity of leadership and followership. Yet, by convention, these phenomena are treated apart. Both leadership and followership represent active roles, given the reality that organizational functions require them at every level. The usual expectation of the leader role as active and the follower role as passive is misconceived even in traditional hierarchies. Barnes and Kriger (1986) observed that leadership does not rest with a single individual but is pluralistic and fluid, in part due to the crossing of the formal structure by informal networks.

In short, leadership is a process, not a person. Because of the common misconception that it belongs to on论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/8 页首页上一页1234567下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非