英语论文网

这个原理在一般均衡性理论中是少数几个相对于分析静力学的命题，它是关税政策、其它税收以及政府干预基础的模型。这个重要的理论源自于它的一些关键信息，其中改变必要的商品价格会导致发生冲突，主要是家庭背景差异性造成的。这篇论文是研究一个普遍性且规模收益稳定的经济活动模式。我们需要重点分析多样化家庭所有权因素的变化对于商品价格和家庭收入的影响。

然而，萨缪尔森理论普遍认为拥有与获得比起早期的版本分析会更加广泛，在第一章节之中我分析了人们如何试图去概括萨缪尔森理论的历史原因，其结果是淡然的。这些扩展应用到模型中,家庭是完全专业化的所有权因素的主要原因,一些固定的行为模式可以限制技术的发展。

The Theorem is one of the few comparative statics propositions in general equilibrium theory and it is the foundation of political economy models of tariffs and other taxes and government interventions. The importance of the theorem derives from its key message; goods price changes necessarily create conflict between households owning different factors. This paper considers a general model of an economy with constant returns to scale. The introduction of diversification in households’ ownership of factors changes the relationships between prices and real incomes fundamentally.

Nevertheless, a generalisation of the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem that holds much more widely than earlier versions can be obtained. Section I provides a brief history of attempts to generalise the original StolperSamuelson Theorem. The outcome is rather dismal. These extensions apply to models in which the households are completely specialised in their ownership of factors, as in the original Theorem and they require quite severe restrictions on the technology when they do hold. All of these generalisations are special cases of one generalised Stolper-Samuelson matrix. Section II develops the concepts of the change in real income, the generalised household income function and the imputed output vector of households which are necessary to extend the theorem. The criterion of real income allows the use of a matrix of real income terms which permits any dimensions and diversified household ownership of factors. The proof of the generalisation of the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem and some other extensions are provided in Section III. Section IV makes some concluding remarks.

Stolper and Samuelson (1941) stated a theorem which predicted the movement of real incomes of factors in an internationally trading economy that may protect an industry and, in effect, certain factor owners employed in the industry. At the heart of this version is a simple and strong relationship between goods prices and factor prices “that has nothing to do with factor scarcity or abundance and is independent of whether prices change because of protection or for any other reason” (Deardorff (1994, p. 12)). Deardorff called this the “essential” version and it is the version now used by most economists. It does, however, require an open economy so that the disturbance which causes the price change can originate in the rest of the world and one can maintain the assumption that the technology and the preferences of the country do not change with the change in price. The Theorem was proven for an economy in which there were only two goods and two non-specific factors. The factors are called labour and capital and the goods 1 and 2. The factors are owned by separate groups of households. With constant returns to scale and both goods produced, there are zero profits. We are interested in the change in real incomes of the owners of the two factors when the prices of goods 1 and 2 change. As the criterion of real income, Stolper and Samuelson chose the income of a factor owner deflated by本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。