英语论文网

Foucault, Moraga, Fuss, hooks, Butler。这些作者，和很多人一样，都开始关心自己，并将自己规到一定的类别。我们在班级阅读这些作家的作品，在会议的各个场合，通过各种方式对他们进行讨论。我们已经发现的部分事实是，事情并没有被他们定义，他们什么都没有。戴安娜做文章，在她的文章“里面输入/输出，”规定“任何身份关系的方式成立，参照构成了对外部或外部定义主体自身的内部边界和肉体表面”上做文章（“内/外”，234） 。一个常见的例子是，从弗洛伊德衍生，男性根据他们具有一个阴茎定义，而女性则缺乏一个定义。定义身份不一定都是这样二元化。由于莫拉加采儿所说的“我除了你，我就知道我是谁”（莫拉加，“双文化的心灵的故障，”237）。

Foucault, Moraga, Fuss, hooks, Butler. These authors, along with many more, have concerned themselves with the defining of categories. In reading these authors our class has, upon every occasion of meeting, discussed the formation of categories. What we have discovered, in part, is that things are not defined by what they are, but by what they are not. Diana Fuss, in her article 'Inside/Out,' states 'any identity is founded relationally, constituted in Reference to an exterior or outside that defines the subject's own interior boundaries and corporeal surfaces' (Fuss, 'Inside/Out,' 234). A common example of this, derived from Freud, is that males are defined by their having a penis, while females are defined by their lack of one. Defining identity is not necessarily so binary. As Cherríe Moraga puts it 'Call me something meant to set me apart from you and I will know who I am' (Moraga, 'The Breakdown of the Bicultural Mind,' 237).

The subcultures of American society, cultures that are not part of the white patriarchy, are defined by how they differ from this white patriarchy. Our class was privileged to be introduced to one subculture found in Harlem during the late 1980s through the documentary Paris is Burning by Jennie Livingston (1992). This documentary captured the lives of men who lived outside the dominant culture. They had several strikes against them: they were Latino and African American, they were homosexual, and many of them were poor, sometimes even homeless. These men came together to form a kinship network, in the form of houses, to protect and support one another. Out of this milieu developed drag balls, balls in which the men dressed up and competed in different categories, such as 'executive,' 'realness,' and 'voguing.' The object of most of these categories was to mimic dominant society by looking like the heterogeneous members of the white patriarchy.

After watching Paris is Burning, reading critiques of it, listening to class discussions, and processing through my own thoughts about the film that I have come to struggle with an extremely large tension I am confronted with in thinking about the drag ball subculture of Harlem. Is the mimicking of dominant society by this culture a way of subverting it or is it supporting and perpetuating the white patriarchal ideal? Do these men redefine dominant society in their own terms and take control of it? Or are they trying to be as close to it as possible in order to be less on the outside and closer to the inside?

The men of this subculture clearly set themselves off from the dominant culture. They belong to houses, each with a mother who looks after them and sisters who provide a support network. Seve本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。