英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

留学生宪法Law Essay [4]

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2014-10-07编辑:zcm84984点击率:10417

论文字数:3254论文编号:org201409281315076794语种:中文 Chinese地区:爱尔兰价格:免费论文

关键词:留学生宪法Law EssayUsa International Law司法管辖权FSIA

摘要:本文是一篇留学生宪法Law Essay,2010年4月在访问美国时,道路运输和高速公路部长卡迈勒?纳特因涉嫌参与1984年的锡克教徒暴乱问题而被联邦地区法院送去了通知。案件是司法部根据《外国人侵权索赔法案》对锡克教组锡克教徒的反人类,有辱人格的待遇和非法杀害的罪名提起诉讼。

immunity, however, does not extend to rulers after they have stepped down from office. [25]

Head-of-state immunity is usually granted only to heads of state and foreign ministers. [26] However, Courts have applied the doctrine to Prime Ministers as well. [27] Further, since the Head-of-State Immunity Doctrine arises from the notion that a State and its ruler are one, for purposes of immunity, and that heads of state must be able to freely perform their duties at home and abroad without the threat of civil and criminal liability in a foreign legal system [28] , other officials in the government can, arguably, seek immunity as well.

However, in El-Hadad v. Embassy of United Arab Emriates [29] , Minister of Higher Education & Scientific Research was not allowed immunity. The Court held, “the head of state immunity doctrine…is limited only to the sitting official head of state. The Court declines to expand the head of state immunity doctrine to cover all agents of the head of state”. In First American Corp. v. Al-Nahyan, [30] the Court did not grant immunity to Minister of Defense of the United Arab Emirates. However, in Weixum v. Xilai [31] , China's former Minister of Commerce was allowed immunity.

(iii) Waiver of immunity

The government of a foreign state which is recognized by the Executive Branch may waive its head-of-state immunity. In the case In re Grand Jury Proceedings [32] , the former President of the Philippines and his wife were not shielded by head-of-state immunity from compulsory process of grand jury investigating possible corruption in American companies' arms contracts with the Philippines; this was because the acting Philippine government had waived whatever head-of-state immunity was enjoyed by the former President and his wife. The Court held that “failure to give effect to the current government's waiver would undermine the international comity that the head-of-state immunity doctrine was designed to promote.” [33]

Part III: Impact of the SC decision in Samantar v. Yousuf

The question of whether Head of State Immunity (and other common law immunities) is affected by the FSIA has come up numerous times, most recently before the US Supreme Court in Samantar v. Yousuf [34] . The answer to this would depend on whether the Courts have held the purpose of the FSIA to include codification of the common law principles of immunity. The answer to this is a unequivocal “No”, pursuant to several District Court decisions, as well as the Supreme Court one.

In Chuidian v. Philippine National Bank [35] , the Ninth Circuit had concluded that an individual acting in his or her official capacity on behalf of a foreign sovereign was entitled to immunity under the FSIA. However, the district court explicitly rejected the Ninth Circuit's view that the FSIA incorporates head-of-state immunity and thus provides the sole framework for analyzing such immunity claims; it held that:

“The view that the FSIA is inapplicable to a head-of-state comports with both the history of the FSIA and its underlying policy of comity. The FSIA was not designed to apply to diplomatic or other consular officials. Instead, it was crafted primarily to allow state-owned companies, which had proliferated in the communist world and in the developing countries, to be sued in United States courts in connection with their commercial ac论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。
英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非