英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

一篇关于互联网诽谤的留学生law essay [4]

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:短文 essay登出时间:2014-11-07编辑:zcm84984点击率:12419

论文字数:3533论文编号:org201411062255204270语种:英语 English地区:马来西亚价格:免费论文

关键词:互联网诽谤留学生law essayInternet ProvidersDefamation

摘要:本文是一篇关于互联网诽谤的留学生law essay,关于诽谤的法律因为涉及到互联网所以一直是一个具有争议的话题。互联网用户在网络上潜在的诽谤性文章或评论创造了一个“不朽的老大难”。

se the outcome was rather disappointing for the claimant. The crucial point of the decision here was that the corporate defendants were proven to have simply provided a route as intermediaries [25] . As Eady J explained, ‘persons who truly fulfil no more than the role of a passive medium for communication cannot be characterised as publishers: thus they do not need a defence’ [26] .


On the one hand it is quite encouraging that in situations where ISPs did not publication participate in the process of as such, but merely acted as facilitators of the publication [27] , are not to be treated as publishers and therefore are able to escape liability. On the other hand, however, one must note the severity of the law towards the ISPs since in situations, like Godfrey, where the ISP has actively chosen to receive and store the news group exchanges containing the posting and retains the power to remove the posting the ISP is deprived of the defence under s.1 Defamation Act.


When assessing the law of defamation, one should keep in mind to evaluate the extent to which an effective balance is stricken between the protection of reputation of the individual and the inherent right of a person to free speech and free communication [28] . Therefore, it appears essential to refer to the impact on freedom of speech created by the liability of ISPs as formed in the UK. What if the statement complained about is not actually libellous, but a fair and true comment? An ISP is certainly not the suitable person neither to establish that a so-called defamatory statement is actually a ‘true and fair’ comment, since this is a question of law, nor the person with any personal interest in finding out whether a statement is actually defamatory and destructive to one person’s reputation or is in fact a fair and true comment.


In theory, ISPs are not compelled to remove a statement that is true. Rather, they can go through the procedures of justifying actions in relation to defamation. However, in practice it is unlikely for ISPs to go through such a complex, costly and time-consuming process in order to mount such a defence [29] . Even so, should a brave internet service provider refuse to remove a statement for which it has received notice, it will subsequently go on to defend itself on the basis that the statement is not defamatory but a purely fair and true comment. To paraphrase Mr Eastwood, doing so would really be a ‘do you feel lucky’ case [30] . Consequently, Imposing liability on an ISP in relation to defamatory posts originally created by Internet users leads to a decrease in the amount of information distributed, since an ISP may leave off publishing in the light of a potential legal liability [31] . Therefore, the effect and applicability of the convention rights, namely freedom of expression is heavily questioned in this context [32] .


Beyond the Atlantic Ocean, a journey which in fact takes no more than a few seconds within the world of cyberspace, there is a completely opposing view in relation to how the law of online defamation should be go论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非