英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

一篇关于互联网诽谤的留学生law essay

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:短文 essay登出时间:2014-11-07编辑:zcm84984点击率:4027

论文字数:3533论文编号:org201411062255204270语种:英语论文 English地区:马来西亚价格:免费论文

关键词:互联网诽谤留学生law essayInternet ProvidersDefamation

摘要:本文是一篇关于互联网诽谤的留学生law essay,关于诽谤的法律因为涉及到互联网所以一直是一个具有争议的话题。互联网用户在网络上潜在的诽谤性文章或评论创造了一个“不朽的老大难”。

互联网提供商关于诽谤的责任


根据基顿的论述,“有大量的关于诽谤的法律是没有任何意义的”。然而尤其是在今天,对于这个论断的正确性我们无法争辩,因为互联网的出现使得言论自由和诽谤自由之间的平衡更加复杂。毫无疑问,互联网创造了一个新的言论自由的现象。它为普通人提供了无限的机会向全世界来表达和发表他的想法。一方面这是个好消息,自由沟通已经变得如此简单,并且通过互联网的发展和扩张,言论自由的权利已经得到了强化。然而另一方面,对名誉的保护而言,互联网世界是无界的,而且并不那么容易调节,它比以往的任何地方都更加危险 [5]。因此,关于诽谤的法律因为涉及到互联网所以一直是一个具有争议的话题。互联网用户在网络上潜在的诽谤性文章或评论创造了一个“不朽的老大难”。[6] 


Liability Of Internet Providers In Relation To Defamation Law essay


According to Keeton, ‘there is a great deal of the law of defamation which makes no sense’. Certainly, the validity of this statement cannot be disputed especially today, where the advent of the Internet has made it almost onerous for a balance between freedom of expression and freedom from defamation to exist. Undoubtedly, the Internet created a new reality of freedom of expression. It provides the ordinary person with limitless opportunities to express and publish his thoughts instantly throughout the globe. On the one hand it is good news that free communication has become so much easier and that the right to freedom of expression has been reinforced through the evolution and expansion of the Internet. On the other hand, however, as far as the protection of reputation is concerned, the online, boundless world, a world not so easy to regulate, is a more perilous place than ever [5] . As a result, the law of defamation as it relates to the Internet has always been a constant ground for controversy. The potential of defamatory posts or comments by Internet users in the web has created a ‘monumental headache’ [6] for the Internet Service Providers [7] , who are involved in their online distribution, since they are the first to be called for holding liability for defamation claims.


This essay, will therefore attempt to make a critique on the liability of the ISPs as it relates to defamation claims borne out of nefarious posts on the Internet. [approach]


In order to appreciate the difference of the law of defamation as it applies to the Internet, it appears essential to firstly refer to the traditional standards of defamation. In the physical world, defamation is essentially a tort and defined as “a statement that harms another’s person reputation [8] .” However, the mere making of a statement cannot give rise to a legal action; liability arises only and if publication of that statement occurs. Consequently, ‘publishers’ like newspapers, magazines and broadcasting media, which conventionally exercise editorial control over content, are normally responsible for the defamatory statements that they make [9] . However, as far as cyberspace is concerned, the answer to the question of who the publisher of a specific statement is, is not that straightforward. This is because the ISPs, which are considered to be the vehicle for the user’s access to the Internet’ [10] , unlike their print and broadcast counterparts, generally do not exert any kind of editorial control over the conte论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/7 页首页上一页1234567下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非

   Europe (24-hours)
   EN:13917206902
   china (24-hours)
   CN:13917206902
在线客服团队
    全天候24小时在线客服
      QQ:949925041 
  

微信公众订阅号