英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

英国仲裁法律作业帮做

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2014-09-29编辑:zcm84984点击率:5968

论文字数:6743论文编号:org201409271716527367语种:英语论文 English地区:英国价格:免费论文

关键词:商业仲裁竞争法Commercial LawInternational Law EssayCompetition Law替代性争端

摘要:本文是一篇英国仲裁法律作业,主要分析新的竞争法是否会影响仲裁,新的竞争法将会影响仲裁和替代性争端解决服务吗?是否需要发现和实施一些预防措施,以确保一个人不会违反竞争法。

新的竞争法会影响仲裁吗?


新的竞争法将会影响仲裁和替代性争端解决服务吗?是否需要发现和实施一些预防措施,以确保一个人不会违反竞争法。


引言


本文肯定了仲裁和替代性争端解决服务实施中的新商标竞争法的影响。本文的作者关注两个截然不同的体制之间的对立立场 [1]即竞争法律和商业仲裁(或替代性争端解决服务)。说明了竞争法的概念,商业仲裁和其他争端解决服务的属性之后,本文将继续深入了解竞争法的可仲裁性,国家竞争机构支持的程度和方式,以及管理竞争法在仲裁中的应用,还有仲裁法庭该如何处理两党之间的私下纠纷,本文全力考虑了更加广泛的政策问题,但可以确保不违反竞争法。


香港竞争法案刚刚在2010年7月初的宪报上刊登,这个法案充分地引用了英国,欧盟、澳大利亚和中国大陆模式,本文将主要通过引用英国仲裁法律和其他地区的经验来探讨上述问题。

Will The New Competition Law Affect Arbitration International Law Essay

Will the new Competition law affect arbitration and alternative dispute resolution services, if so what precautions will one need to observe and implement to ensure that one is not contravening the Competition law.

Abstract

This paper affirms the influence of the brand new competition law on the operation of arbitration and alternative dispute resolution services. The writer of this paper will concern the confronting positions between the two contrasting regimes [1] , that is, competition law and commercial arbitration (or alternative dispute resolution services). After illustrating the concepts of competition law, the attributes of commercial arbitration and other dispute resolution services, the paper will then proceed to examine the arbitrability of competition law, the extent and manner of national competition authority to support and govern the application of competition law within arbitration, as well as how should an arbitral tribunal, dealing with a private dispute between two parties, obliges to try its best to consider wider policy issues but still capable to ensure no contravention to the

Since the Hong Kong Competition Bill has just been gazetted on early July 2010 and the Bill referenced itself substantially to the model of the UK, the European Union, the Australia and Mainland China, this paper will explore the above issues by mainly referencing to English arbitration law and experiences of other jurisdictions.

Introduction: The Contrasting Regimes of Commercial Arbitration and Competition Law

Competition law is a system of public law. It dominates the private relationship of economic entitles by adopting measures which can be placed above the parties’ own provisions. [2] Whereas commercial arbitration, a contractual process, allows parties to a dispute consent to resolve their dispute through a third party tribunal which comprises of one or three arbitrators. [3] For this reason, the parties not only can resolve the dispute in private but also enjoy certain specific reservations over confidentiality in the proceeding and the outcome. [4]

The diverse perspectives of these two regimes attracted keen pensiveness from academics and practitioners. Remarkably different views concerning the tension of these two areas of law are continuously being expressed. Lawyers practicing in commercial transaction worry the oversimplification of the impact of public law which changed the private resolution of the parties to resolve their own affairs. [5] Meanwhile, lawyers practicing in competition law expressed their solicitude to the adverse effect on the general and standard application of competition law if the competition policy can be resolved in a private and the extensively confidential procedures. [6]

In the context of commercial arbitration, co论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/13 页首页上一页1234567下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非

   Europe (24-hours)
   EN:13917206902
   china (24-hours)
   CN:13917206902
在线客服团队
    全天候24小时在线客服
      QQ:949925041 
  

微信公众订阅号