英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

澳洲留学生公司法论文定制:Responsibilities of directors

论文作者:代写留学生论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2011-05-09编辑:zn1987点击率:3722

论文字数:9829论文编号:org201105091137207538语种:英语论文 English地区:澳大利亚价格:$ 66

关键词:AustraliaComparative lawCorporate governanceCorporate social responsibility

International Company and Commercial Law Review
Recent developments 代写留学生论文in Australian corporate law and their implications for directors' duties: lessons to be learned from the UK perspective

Subject: company law

Keywords: Australia; Comparative law; Corporate governance; corporate social responsibility;
Directors' powers and duties

Introduction
In Australia and the United Kingdom, directors' duties have been scrutinised and review made fortheir reform. The UK Government launched a fundamental review of the framework of core companylaw in March 1999, with the publication of a general consultation paper, “Modern Company Law for aCompetitive Economy”. Successive reports from the independent Company Law Review SteeringGroup (CLRSG)produced a substantial number of recommendations for change and proposed astatutory statement of directors' duties to provide greater clarity on what is expected of directors andmake the law more accessible.Further, the CLRSG set out the case made by those who argue thatwhat is required is a reformed definition of the concept of shareholder primacy. It called this broaderapproach “enlightened shareholder value”, which requires a director to promote the success of thecompany for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so, to have regard, among othermatters, to: the likely consequences of any decision in the long term; the interests of the company'semployees; the need to foster business relationships with suppliers, customers and others; the impactof the company's operations on the community and the environment; and finally the need to act fairlyas between members of the company. The Government accepted most but not all of theseproposals,3 and went on to enshrine enlightened shareholder value in s.172 of the Companies Act2006. Correspondingly, the Australian review of corporate law is in response to widespread interest inthe topic of corporate social responsibility, and its implications for companies, investors and otherinterest groups, including the environmental and social context.This is most obviously reflected inthe publication of two important Reports in 2006, which includes the recent investigation by theAustralian Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (the ParliamentaryJoint Committee, PJC) of corporate social responsibility and its subsequent report, “CorporateResponsibility: Managing Risk and Creating Value”,and the even more recent report of Australia'sCorporations and Markets Advisory Committee (CAMAC)on the same topic. The scope of theCAMAC inquiry is comprehensive, and there are many issues common to both the CAMAC inquiryand the inquiry of the Joint Parliamentary Committee.

A fundamental issue facing this review of Australian corporate law related to, among other 313 things, the conduct of business corporations and issues of social responsibility, as well asresponding to the questions raised in the terms of reference from the Government of whether existinglegal requirements should be amended expressly to require or permit directors to have regard toenumerated special interests. The basis for such consideration is the power of corporations to affectthe “economic, social and environmental”interests of these non-shareholder constituencies,particularly those that are vulnerable to any abuse of that power. Similar to the CLRSG, following aseries of consultations, the Parliamentary Joint Committee and the CAMAC were of the view that theshareholder primacy 论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/2 页首页上一页12下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非

   Europe (24-hours)
   EN:13917206902
   china (24-hours)
   CN:13917206902
在线客服团队
    全天候24小时在线客服
      QQ:949925041 
  

微信公众订阅号