英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

law assignment about 美国企业的社会责任

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:议论文 Argument Essay登出时间:2015-08-03编辑:Karlie点击率:14223

论文字数:3629论文编号:org201507292220319267语种:英语 English地区:美国价格:免费论文

关键词:

摘要:本论文主要阐述了有关于美国企业社会责任的法律法规,由于美国社会和环境问题不断出现,美国政府采取立法手段来解决这些环境问题,并且举了很多具体的例子,让读者深入了解美国企业社会责任的法律法规。

美国企业社会责任的法律法规


由于20世纪60年代末和70年代初兴起的社会和环境问题,美国政府决定通过法律来解决这些问题。所采取的立法包括污染和危险废物控制(如联邦水污染控制法,清洁空气法案修正案1977),工作场所(如职业安全与健康法1970,平等就业机会法1972)和消费者保护(如消费者产品安全法案,联邦危险物质法案)(赫斯,2001)。虽然公司必须符合国家和联邦政府的要求,但没有要求向公众报告他们的表现。在20世纪90年代,当公司使用企业社会责任报告作为损害控制的时候,报告再次出现。例如,埃克森美孚用企业社会责任报告的漏油事故后,耐克也被指责在南洋违反童工标准。但是问题在于,不具有可比性和一致性标准,目前的报告只代表有偏见的营销活动。[ 1 ]

Legal Provisions For Csr Under Usa 


Due to the social and environmental concerns that arose in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the US government passed laws to address the issues. The legislation adopted included pollution and hazardous waste control (e.g. Federal Water Pollution Control Act, The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977), the workplace (e.g. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, The Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972) and consumer protection (e.g. The Consumer Product Safety Act, The Federal Hazardous Substances Act) (Hess, 2001). While companies had to meet the requirements set by the state and federal government, there was no requirement on reporting their performance to the public. Reporting came to the forefront again in the 1990s when companies used CSR reports as damage control. For example, Exxon-Mobil used CSR reporting after the Valdez oil spill, as did Nike after accusations of violating child labour standards in Southeast Asia. The problem with this is that without comparability and consistency standards the current reports merely represent biased marketing campaigns. [1] 

In reaction to early regulation, there was a purposeful move by corporations to set up government affairs positions to administer their relations with Washington. Corporate lobbyists engage policy makers to define legislation that is advantageous to their business. In turn, supervisory body groups representing the public lobby congress to ensure that social, environmental and economic development concerns are measured against corporate concerns. As a result, the internal CSR movement is well defined, regulated and disseminated in an effort to influence the public and Congress. [2] 

In USA, the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) team in the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs leads the Department's engagement with U.S. businesses in the promotion of responsible and ethical business practices. The mission of the CSR office is to: [3] 

Promote a holistic approach to CSR to complement the EB Bureau's mission of building economic security and fostering sustainable development at home and abroad.

Provide guidance and support for American companies engaging in socially responsible, forward-thinking corporate activities that complement U.S. foreign policy and the principles of the Secretary's Award for Corporate Excellence (ACE) program.

Build on this synergy, working with multinational companies, civil society, labour groups, environmental advocates, and others to encourage the adoption of corporate policies that help companies 'do well by doing good.'

In sum, U.S. progress to date has been partial and issue-specific. Â There is no signal of enough force to prompt most U.S. corporations to develop human rights policies and procedures except for the largest, brand-facing companies, many of which have these in place anyway. But the United States cannot afford to ignore the issue. It needs t论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/8 页首页上一页1234567下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非