英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

留学生法律判决作业

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2014-09-28编辑:zcm84984点击率:3420

论文字数:3199论文编号:org201409271708533804语种:英语论文 English地区:澳大利亚价格:免费论文

关键词:Law EssayJustice民事审判建立法治司法保护

摘要:本文是一篇留学生法律判决作业,通过争端解决来达到正义,有效地实现正义是建立法治的基本条件之一。在过去,获得司法保护的权利基本上几乎完全意味着愤愤不平的个人正式提出诉讼或索赔辩护的权利,这是在严格的法律条款中规定的。

通过争端解决来达到正义


有效地实现正义是建立法治的基本条件之一。在过去,获得司法保护的权利基本上几乎完全意味着愤愤不平的个人正式提出诉讼或索赔辩护的权利,这是在严格的法律条款中规定的。更广泛的观点是ADR这样的声明背后又意味着什么:打开解决纠纷的新途径,缓解过度冗杂的状况,使法院减少不必要的缓慢。世界上存在的对抗性诉讼并不是解决纠纷唯一的途径。拥塞在法庭上打官司, 除了延迟、成本、程序之外还缺乏劳动力和资源,说出来这些需求更好方案,方法和途径。特别是ADR过程对司法系统具有重要的意义,必须尝试建立有效的解决方式的替代方法,这可以显著减少上民事法庭之前的小型纠纷,帮助提高法官的效率。


根据主伍尔夫的论述“…今天的民事审判面临的关键问题是成本,延迟和复杂性”。[1]

Access To Justice Through Dispute Resolution Law Essay

Effective access to justice is one of the fundamental conditions for the establishment of the rule of law. In the past, the right of access to judicial protection meant essentially and almost exclusively the aggrieved individual’s formal right to litigate or defend a claim, defined in strictly legal terms. A broader view of what is going on behind such claims, which characterizes ADR, opens new pathways to resolving disputes, relieving the overcrowding that makes court cases unnecessarily slow. The world has experienced that adversarial litigation is not the only means of resolving disputes. Congestion in courtrooms, lack of labour and resources in addition with delay, cost, procedure, speak out for the need of better options, approaches, and avenues. In particular, ADR processes are of significant importance to justice systems when effective establishment of alternative means of dispute resolution can significantly reduce the number of minor disputes before the civil courts, helping to improve the availability of judges for cases, which must be tried.

According to Lord Woolf “…. the key problem facing civil justice today is cost, delay, and complexity”. [1] He further noted “Without effective judicial control…. the consequence is that the expense is often excessive, disproportionate, and unpredictable; and delay is frequently unreasonable. [2] His three main aspects of reforms were: (i) judicial case management, (ii) pre-action protocols and (iii) alternatives to going to court. Even with that change in the Civil Procedure for expeditious disposal of cases through the traditional court process, the reformer gave importance to alternative dispute resolution.

The Supreme Court of India has made a critical observation regarding civil litigation: “Justice cries in silence for long, far too long. The procedural wrangle is eroding the faith in our justice system” [3] . Justice V.R. Krishna Ayer comments about the court system of India: “Watching the dilatory complexities of our forensic procedures, the meaningless waste of judicial time and energy from the trial court to the high and supreme courts and the easy possibility of economy of time and money, one wonders why we hesitate to change”. [4]

“Access to justice connotes more than simply entering into formal courts of law; it includes the ability to reach lawmakers, lawyers, law enforcing officials and the capacity to pay for these services.

In the ADR approach, for example, disputes were classified by function of the forum best suited to solve the same. This idea, called ‘new formalism’, [5] supposes that disputes are sufficiently stable and can be described using a limited number of variables [6] such as admitted liability [7] or relational distance between the parties, [8] that have been found to affect on disputants’ degree of satisfaction and compliance with diverse dispute resolution modes and outcomes. [9] Procedural justice, i.e., the degree o论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/6 页首页上一页123456下一页尾页

相关文章

    英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非

       Europe (24-hours)
       EN:13917206902
       china (24-hours)
       CN:13917206902
    
    在线客服团队
        全天候24小时在线客服
          QQ:949925041 
      

    微信公众订阅号