英语论文网

/> 4.1 Research Questions ......... 33 
4.2 Subjects ........... 33 
4.3 Teaching Procedures ....... 34 
4.3.1 Teaching Procedures in the Experimental Group ......... 34 
4.3.2 Teaching Procedures in the Control Group ........... 35 
4.3.3 Compositions and Questionnaire .......... 35 
4.4 Data Collection ....... 35 
4.5 Data Analysis .......... 36 
Chapter Five Results and Discussion ........... 39 
5.1 Characteristics of Nominal Group Application Before the Experiment ......... 39 
5.2 Characteristics of Nominal Group Application After the Experiment .... 44
5.3 Causes of the Changes in the Use of Nominal Groups ........... 51 
5.4 Strategies in EFL Writing Teaching ........ 55 

Chapter Five Results and Discussion 

The previous chapter has presented the methodology adopted in the present study. This  chapter  presents  the  results  of  the  study  and  discussion  of  the  results.  This chapter in details presents characteristics of the use of nominal groups before and after the  experiment,  causes  of  the  changes  in  the  application  of  nominal  groups,  and strategies in EFL writing teaching. 

5.1  Characteristics  of  Nominal  Group  Application  Before  the Experiment  

Before  the  experiment,  33  valid  compositions  are  collected  in  the  experimental group (EG). In the control group (CG), 33 valid compositions are also collected. Each kind of modifiers in nominal groups in the EG compositions and CG compositions are marked and  counted.  The number and the percentage  of different  modifiers by  both groups of students are displayed in Table 5.1.  Notes:  the  percentage  per  modifier  =  the  total  number  of  that  modifier  ÷  the  total  number  of modifiers;  the  number  per  modifier  =  the  total  number  of  that  modifier  ÷   the  number  of compositions.  As shown in Table 5.1, according to the data in EG, the percentage of the ―single pre-modifiers by EG is highest (52.9%) among the five kinds of modifiers  and  the percentage of the ―two or more pre-modifiers is the lowest (6.4%); the percentage of the  ―phrase post-modifiers by EG is second-highest  (18.9%)  and  the  percentage  of the  ―clause  post-modifiers  by  EG  is  third-highest  (10.9%).  The  percentage  of  the each kind of modifiers by CG is similar with that by EG. The percentage of the ―single pre-modifiers by CG is highest (56.4%) among the five kinds of modifiers and the percentage of the ―two or more pre-modifiers is the lowest (5.8%); the percentage of the  ―phrase post-modifiers by CG is second-highest  (19.9%)  and  the  percentage  of ―of structure post-modifiers by CG is  third-highest (10.6%). Number of modifiers per composition by EG and that by CG is the same (18). 

&tar0本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。