Shrimp Products 37 I.LM 832 (1998)
14 WTO, Appellate Body Report: United States--Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products 38 I.L.M 118 (1998)
15 In response to the ruling the U.S. has proposed to alter the way it implements the Act but it has not changed the Act itself.
16 see supra note 14 para 185
17 For example, in the shrimp case, the U.S. would have had to engage in bilateral or multilateral negotiation with shrimp harvesting countries. Only if these had proven to be unsuccessful could the U.S. have introduced unilateral measures. These unilateral measures would have needed to be designed such that differing conditions in different countries are taken into account, that all countries are granted the same ?phase-in? periods, that the U.S. undertakes the same effort in transferring sea turtle safe-harvesting technology to all relevant parties, and that the certification process is transparent and allows affected countries to be heard and to appeal against non-certification. see supra note 14 para 163-180
18 see http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/environment.pdf
19 Embracing Greenery, Economist, Oct.9, 1999, at 89-90
20 see Steve Charnovitz: World Trade and the Environment: A Review of the New WTO Report, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Winter, 2000
21 Craig A.A.Dixon: Environmental survey of WTO dispute panel resolution panel decision since 1995:?Trade at all costs?? William and Mary Environmental Law a英语论文网 【http://www.51lunwen.org】nd Policy Review, Winter 2000
22 See Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Environmental labelling in OECD Countries 43 (1991)
23 id
本文来自：英语论文网 【http://www.51lunwen.org】 |
论文编号：
lw200701122206316465 
