China Thesis Base|U.K.overseas students term paper| research| essay|thesis|paper|dissertation
My China Thesis Base 我的英国论文网
中文版 English 上海 英国 澳洲 加拿大
2008/11/20 Thursday
|Home 主页|Paper 论文库 |Order!定做代写 |Sell Papers出售论文 |Our Works留学论文 |Teachers论文老师
  |Managment|Marketing|HRM|Logistics|E-commerce|Finance&Accounting|Law|Education |Arts&Media|
  |代写 Thesis | 代写 Dissertation |代写 Assignment |代写 Term paper |代写 Coursework|
 
Key Words
  [essays and dissertation][Law][Intellectual Property Law]E-contracts论文



论文编号: org200806160913297621
论文属性: assignment guidelines
论文语言:English
论文国家:U.K.
登出日期: 2008-06-16  
字数: 2244
源程序: 无
价格: 免费论文
参考相关附件:
 
论文大纲,目录
关键词搜索:E-contracts   contract law    
 
r, and it is for the seller to accept.
However the American courts have said, in the case of Amazon’s ‘1-click’ system, that when a customer has provided his credit card details and other information which identifies him to Amazon, that clicking once on a virtual item will constitute an acceptance. British law would reach the opposite conclusion.


Distance Contracts and Acceptance of the Offer
Problems can arise where there is a period of time between any offer and acceptance passing, during which one of the parties wishes to change their own position, for example, to withdraw an offer or an acceptance. Where communication is not instantaneous, such as by post, there have to be legal rules to cope with such problems. The so-called postal rule in the U.K. is that an unqualified acceptance which is posted concludes a bargain when it is posted. The bargain is not concluded when the post is received. The rationale for this appears to be that once posted the acceptance can not be intercepted, and that it might be a greater injustice to allow the offeror to withdraw an offer when the acceptor had done all he could to accept. A similar position applies in the USA under their ‘mailbox rule’, but the legal rule is by no means universally accepted and indeed it still courts controversy today. Other types of communication may be regarded as having the essential features of face-to-face communication, such as voice telephony or telex, in that communication is instantaneous英语论文网 【http://www.51lunwen.org】. In the case if instantatneous/face-to-face communications, the postal rule is not relevant and it is the communication and understanding of an intelligible acceptance that is critical. Other types of communication are of debatable legal status, such as facsimile, email or SMS text message on a mobile phone.


The generally accepted legal rule is that an offeror may stipulate how an offer is to be accepted, for example as to the manner and time of acceptance. This may override other rules such as the customary postal rule, by providing that acceptance is not constituted until an acceptance is received. Indeed there has been case law in England to the effect that competitive tenders that have been invited on an equal footing have all to be considered on an equal footing. This effectively means that an offeror may have rights to have his offer considered, if not actually accepted.


To summarise;
When is the contract formed?


A contract must constitute an offer and an acceptance between the parties. This offer and acceptance signifies that a meeting of the minds - consensus in idem – has been reached. If you alter the terms of your acceptance then there is no contract. What has happened is that the roles have been reversed and the acceptance becomes a qualified acceptance or counter offer which must be unconditionally accepted by the original offeror.  In the case of automated decision making, it appears that if the machine has no discretion, or the 本文来自:英语论文网 【http://www.51lunwen.org】

第1页 第2页 第3页 第4页 第5页 第6页 第7页 第8页 第9页 第10页 第11页 
最新论文 最热门论文
Copyright (c) 2002 ~ 2004 China Thesis Base. All rights reserved.