China Thesis Base|U.K.overseas students term paper| research| essay|thesis|paper|dissertation
My China Thesis Base 我的英国论文网
中文版 English 上海 英国 澳洲 加拿大
2008/11/20 Thursday
|Home 主页|Paper 论文库 |Order!定做代写 |Sell Papers出售论文 |Our Works留学论文 |Teachers论文老师
  |Managment|Marketing|HRM|Logistics|E-commerce|Finance&Accounting|Law|Education |Arts&Media|
  |代写 Thesis | 代写 Dissertation |代写 Assignment |代写 Term paper |代写 Coursework|
 
Key Words
  [essays and dissertation][Law][Intellectual Property Law]E-commerce and Intellectual Properrty:SPAM论文



论文编号: org200806160942349785
论文属性: assignment guidelines
论文语言:English
论文国家:U.K.
登出日期: 2008-06-16  
字数: 4000
源程序: 无
价格: 免费论文
参考相关附件:
 
论文大纲,目录
关键词搜索:E-commerce   Intellectual Properrty   SPAM    
 
lation also prohibits the instigating of an unsolicited transmission. If direct marketing does take place, the recipient must be provided with the name of the person using or instigating the direct marketing via the public communication service.


Regulation 22 provides that direct marketing unsolicited electronic communications can only be sent where the recipient has previously notified the sender that he consents to such communications, for the time being. However, the regulation’s consumer protection impact is lessened by the tripartite list of exceptions outlined in subsection 3. Firstly, direct marketing e-mails can be sent where the sender has obtained the contact details of the recipient in the course of the sale or negotiations for the sale of a product or service to that recipient. Secondly, the direct marketing only relates to similar products and services of the sender and lastly, the recipient has been given a simple means of refusing the use of his contact details and that means is free of charge except for the costs of transmission of the refusal message. This system has been described as a ‘soft’ opt-in regime. 


There are a number of serious concerns with this exception. The primary problem relates to the fact that direct marketing e-mails can be sent where the recipient’s contact details have been obtained by the sender during the course of the sale or negotiations for the sale of a prod英语论文网 【http://www.51lunwen.org】uct or service. At first glance this appears to be a reasonable restriction that takes into account the needs of both the recipient and the sender. However, on closer inspection it becomes clear that the provision is potentially destructive of a recipient’s privacy.


If we consider the situation of door-stop selling and telesales, if this provision were applicable, it would enable double glazing salespeople  to phone or visit potential customers, harangue them with an aggressive sales spiel and then conduct a follow up visit.


The provision entitles the recipient to refuse further communications and this is the nub of the problem. The potential customer is exactly that: a potential customer. If a person completes the online transactional process and buys a product or service, then that person is a customer of the company. In the euphoria of the post-purchase timeframe, where the customer is expectantly awaiting delivery of the product or service, the customer may not remember to tick the box prohibiting further commercial e-mails. When a subsequent e-mail does arrive, the customer simply replies stating that they are not interested in receiving further e-mails. In the case of potential customers, depending on how far they have progressed through the transactional process, they may have provided personal data such as a name and address or even reached the stage of inputting credit card details. If the pote 本文来自:英语论文网 【http://www.51lunwen.org】

第1页 第2页 第3页 第4页 第5页 第6页 第7页 第8页 第9页 
最新论文 最热门论文
Copyright (c) 2002 ~ 2004 China Thesis Base. All rights reserved.