essay写作栏目提供最新essay写作格式、essay写作硕士论文范文。详情咨询QQ:4006227154

资本资产定价模型essay范文

论文编号:lw201705271213353445 所属栏目:essay写作 发布日期:2018年02月09日 论文作者:无忧论文网
资本资产定价模型(CAPM)是一个非常有用的模型,它是在行业中广泛使用,即使它是基于非常强大的假设。根据该地区最近的事态发展讨论。
有时候你最好的投资是那些你不做的投资。这个格言显示了投资的复杂性。
1963年金融杂志文章的资本资产价格:风险条件介绍了资本资产定价模型为基础的市场均衡理论。CAPM模型,提供了一个简单的和令人信服的资产市场定价理论,通过组合投资的关联到一个单一的风险系数(β系数)。这一理论认为,在无风险利率资产预期收益的不可分散风险的比例。从这个意义上说,安全性测试的贝塔值越高,该资产的预期回报就越高。


The Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a very useful model and it is used widely in the industry even though it is based on very strong assumptions. Discuss in the light of recent developments in the area.

Sometimes your best investments are the ones you don't make."[1] This maxim shows the complexity of investing.

In 1963, the finance journal article Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk introduced the foundations of the Capital Asset Pricing Model. The CAPM, initially proposed by Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965) has provided a simple and compelling theory of asset market pricing through the association of a portfolio investment to a single risk factor (the Beta factor)[2].This theory predicts that the expected return on an asset above the risk-free rate is proportional to the nondiversifiable risk. In this sense the higher the quantity of beta of a security, the higher is the expected return of that asset.

In the years following the publication of the CAPM, and after comparing actual returns with expected returns, several Economists have criticised its simplicity and the reality of its application. Although the CAPM has been the basis for more than one hundred academic papers and has had significant impact on the non-academic financial community, it is still subject to theoretical and empirical criticism. Despite its apparent invalidity, the model is still commonly used by firms as an effective model for calculating cost of capital by explaining higher return in securities with higher betas. This paper will then discuss these implications in light of recent development in the area. First, I will attempt in this paper to explain and discuss the different assumptions of the model. Second, I will discuss the main theories and furthermore, the whole debate surrounding this area especially through the critics of the assumptions.

The financial applications of the CAPM are numerous. Indeed, it is used to value a firms common stock, for capital budgeting, for merger and acquisition analysis and the valuation of warrants and convertible securities[3]. For the CAPM to be valid, William Sharpe made several assumptions for investors in creating market equilibrium. The proponents of the model argue that the capital market operates as if these assumptions were satisfied. The model derives what is the price that any asset must command in order for the investors to be happy to hold the current market portfolio (portfolio of all assets in the economy). In short, the model determines for X amount of market risk this is the expected return.

Under CAPM, everyone is bearing the same risk in different amounts. Investors hold diversified portfolios and they will require a return for the systematic risk of their portfolios since unsystematic risk has been removed and can be ignored. An investor will then rank a portfolio according to a utility function which depends on this portfolios expected rate of return. Since everybody holds the same portfolio of risky assets; it is ordinary that everybody is exactly happy to buy the market portfolio (the portfolio of all assets that are being offered on the market).

Moreover, it is possible to diversify part of the risk through the purchase of many different assets.[4] The riskiness of a stock is not essentially related to the variability of its return. The variability would be the appropriate measure if one investor is putting all his money in a single asset. In reality, it is possible to diversify part of the risk through the purchase of many different assets.[5]Indeed, through diversification, it is possible to eliminate the risk that is unique to individual stocks but not the risk that the marke