英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

神经经济学的基础:从理念到实践的发展过程

论文作者:meisishow论文属性:学术文章 Scholarship Essay登出时间:2014-07-06编辑:meisishow点击率:10489

论文字数:3786论文编号:org201407031148028176语种:英语 English地区:英格兰价格:免费论文

关键词:FoundationsNeuroeconomics神经经济学论文PhilosophyPractice

摘要:神经经济学(Neuroeconomics)是一个新兴的跨学科领域,它运用神经科学技术来确定与经济决策相关的神经机制。这里的“经济”应该更广义地理解为(人类或其他动物)在评价选项(alternatives)所做出的任何决策过程。

Foundations of NeuroEconomics: From Philosophy to Practice


证据表明,神经科学可以提高我们对经济现象的理解[1 - 4]。源自于众多的实验结果验证了大脑区域的功能,包括指导对公平(5、6)和不公平的社会交往做出反应[7],解决不确定性决策[8],对风险规避[10][9]和主观价值进行追踪,说服自己意愿去支付(11、12)以及对错误信息做出反应(13、14)。令人沮丧的是,当前批评人士指责神经科学和经济学基本上是不相容的[16],而这个论点许多社会科学家一致也同样认同的。经济蓬勃发展了几个世纪,没有神经科学和一些经济学家认为,现有的神经经济学的研究比主流经济学(17、18)更加有用。


我们拒绝这中对神经科学的指责——认为神经学不能影响经济模型,即使是在基本原则方面也不能。我们专注于对整合这一领域的两类批评。这两类批评我们称之为行为充分性观和突发现象观。我们这里显示这些论点包含隐藏的假设使他们在科学的实际约束力方面得到消弱。


Evidence that neuroscience improves our understanding of economic phenomena [1–4] comes from a broad array of novel experimental findings, including demonstrations of brain regions that guide responses to fair [5,6] and unfair [7] social interactions, that resolve uncertainty during decision making [8], that track loss aversion [9] and subjective value [10], and that encode willingness to pay [11,12] and reward error signals [13,14]. Yet, neuroEconomics has been characterized as a faddish juxtaposition, not an integration, of disparate domains [15]. More damningly, critics have charged that neuroscience and economics are fundamentally incompatible [16], an argument that resonates with many social scientists. Economics thrived for centuries in the absence of neuroscience and some economists argue that existing neuroeconomics research is not useful to mainstream economics [17,18].


We reject the fundamental charge that neuroscience cannot influence economic modeling, even in principle, and focus on two criticisms of integrating these fields, which we label the Behavioral Sufficiency and Emergent Phenomenon arguments. We show here that these arguments contain hidden assumptions that render them unsound within the practical constraints of science.


We go on to explore two interrelated questions: is there a unique niche for a field of neuroeconomics, and, if so, what are its proper foundational principles? We do not rely on the recent demonstrations of brain systems that support economic behavior nor recount the valid concerns about potential technological constraints of neuroscience. Rather, we attempt to clarify the necessary foundations for neuroeconomics research [19–21], for which we identify two core principles, Mechanistic Convergence and Biological Plausibility.


We then ask how information about neural mechanisms improves the predictive and explanatory power of economic models. Importantly, the points we raise here recapitulate both the cognitive revolution [22] and the subsequent intertwining of cognitive Psychology and cognitive neuroscience [23,24]. We believe that the seemingly disparate neural and social sciences have much to gain from each other.


We define neuroeconomics as the convergence of the neural and social sciences, applied to the understanding and prediction of decisions about rewards [25], such as money, food, information acquisition, physical pleasure or pain, and social interactions. Neuroscience brings a wealth of technological approaches, including brain imaging [e.g., functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)], lesion studies, molecular biology, pharmacology, and electrophysiology. Economics adds conceptual principles (e.g., rationality and utility), statistical techniques, and rigorous modeling. Psychology provides evidence for decision biases such as he论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/3 页首页上一页123下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非