英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

Methodological themes Empirical research in accounting:alternative approaches and a case for“middle-range” thinking [7]

论文作者:PAT SUCHER论文属性:短文 essay登出时间:2008-06-10编辑:点击率:29930

论文字数:3600论文编号:org200806101038079925语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:免费论文

关键词:Methodological themesEmpirical researchaccountingalternative approaches

d actual gaps in the genealogy) to the contemporary schools of thought highlighted in Figure 2. Figure 3 depicts in broad terms what is, in effect, a claim that there are three major streams of empirical investigative endeavour which are traceable to respectively Auguste Comte, Immanuel Kant/Georg Hegel and Immanuel Kant/Johann Fichte. Each of these streams of thought are, in turn, traceable to the endeavours of early scientists such as Bacon (1561-1626), with his dominant Christian underpinning of God’s ordering of a rational world waiting to be discovered through rational processes, to the more agnostic position and division between the European “rationalists” (for example, Descartes (1596-1650), Spinoza (1632-1677), Leibniz (1646-1716)) and the English “empiricists” (for example, Locke (1632-1704), Berkeley (1685-1753), Hume (1711-1776)). The “rationalists” maintained that it was possible through reason to obtain an “…absolute description of the world uncontaminated by the experience of any observer” (Scruton, 1982, p. 14). “Empiricists”, on the other hand, “…argued that we have no ideas at all other than those whichcome to us via our senses” (Brown, 1969, pp. 60-1). As a result, to the “empiricists”, any statements, apart from those of pure logic, can be known to be “…true or false only by testing them in experience” (Brown, 1969, pp. 60- 1). The claims and counter-claims between these major streams of thought in the seventeenth century were remarkable: both claimed absolute truth for their chosen approach and each was dismissive of the other’s perspective on understanding. This battle, which seemed to have no solution, was finally resolved by Kant’s amalgamation and critique of both schools of thought followed by Comte’s somewhat unquestioning binding together of these different traditions. To Kant neither experience nor reason alone can generate understanding and, of arguably more importance, all discovery is mediated through human beings making the insights generated always conditional and inevitably subjective. His critique of the “rationalists” and “empiricists” is a tortuous journey, but in essence his criticism against the former is that it generates form without content and for the latter that it derives content without form. More fundamental though is the very fact that, to Kant, all insights are inevitably subjective because no knowledge is generated distinct from the observer whose reasoning and experiential powers are not uniform or determined. Scruton (1982, p. 18) puts the issues succinctly in the following way: Objects do not depend for their existence on my knowing them; but their nature is determined by the fact that they can be perceived. Objects are not Leibnizian monads, knowable only to the perspectiveless stance of “pure reason”; nor are they Humean “impressions”, features of my own experience. They are objective, but their character is given by the point of view through which they can be known.While this logic may seem obvious and unsurprising to our twentieth-century minds it was revolutionary in eighteenth-century thought. It was also far from fully worked through by Kant. It was this latter aspect which was key in understanding the diversity of perspectives which followed Kant’s “enlightenment”. Two areas of ambivalence in Kantian thought are significant. The first is related to the ontological question concerning a material existence. If all insights are mediated through experience then to what degree is r论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。
英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非