摘要:Transforming economies models are so various that the justification of them will be too huge to cover in this essay. But still there are lessons to learn from all of them. In short, there is no best employment relation model. Every one has its advantages and disadvantages.
er, the main characteristic of the transforming economies is unpredictability (Zhu, Warner 2000: p. 351). The current existing models cannot satisfy an ever-changing economy and employment relations. Under such circumstances, nevertheless, the countries with transforming economies still harvest in terms of stably developing economy and balanced employment relations, China being one of the examples (Zhu, Warner 2000: p. 351). There are lessons still to be learn from their models and their experience. Furthermore, the ideology of these countries determines that some points in their model will be consistent (Fuchs 2002: p. 157). As a result these points may be found in the models if enough models can be studied. The scope of this task is too large for this essay so here no conclusion will be given for the transforming economies models.
Conclusion
Tosum up, European Social Model takes care of the disadvantaged and unemployed citizens so the welfare can be distribute to the employees. Employees benefits can be guaranteed in this model. However its purposed has shift nowadays from building a social-democratic Europe to enhancing the economy and improving the employment relations of Europe. Anglo-Saxon Model has been claimed as a corpse for its failure in the application on capitalism. The few regulations and low tax of this model result in the financial crisis and the lost of jobs in the market. It seems to die out of
history sooner but still some theorists are trying to save it or polish it. The Japanese Model brings the employees sense of security but as a result the employees lose their incentives because they do not want to make mistakes which is the only way to lose jobs. At the same time the companies cannot recruit the best candidates and replace the incompetent ones. The Communist Model is utopian and failed in the Soviet Union. But improvement has been seen in Chinese example whose foundation of economy and employment relations is still communism. Transforming economies models are so various that the justification of them will be too huge to cover in this essay. But still there are lessons to learn from all of them. In short, there is no best employment relation model. Every one has its advantages and disadvantages.
References
Baker T. B. (2009). Towards a New Employment Relationship Model: Aligning the
Changing Needs of Individual and Organisation.
Leadership and Organisation
Development Journal, 30(3), pp. 197-223.
Baliga S, Polak B. (2001). The Emergence and Persistence of the Anglo-Saxon and
German Financial Systems. The Society for Financial Studies, 17, pp. 129-163.
Blair T. (2005). A Year of Huge Challenges. The Economist, 1, pp. 1-4.
Denny L. B. (2009). Obituary: The Anglo-Saxon Model. (Online). [Updated on
December 30 2009]. Available at:
Estrin S, Basu S, Svejnar J. (2000). Employment and Wages in Enterprises under
Communism and in Transition: Evidence from Central Europe and
Russia. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 58(3), pp. 353-369.
Fuchs M. (2002). Changing Employment Relations, New Organisational Mo
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。