摘要:外商投资分析一直是留学生论文中的热点话题,但是很少有人针对外商直接投资的数量和分布的变化做出分析,本文站在此角度进行分析,评估了与外商直接投资有关的相关数据和业务环境,识别和应用理论概念和框架来评估和比较不同的国家或区域的商业环境。
the shares of risky and safe countries in world FDI evolve in a way that is in line with our main contention. Namely, when the global volume of FDI increases, the share of risky countries tends to increase. Conversely, when the global volume of FDI decreases,
The share of risky countries tends to decrease. It therefore seems that investors worry less about political risk when the global volume of FDI is larger this finding also implies that global risk taking increases when worldwide FDI activity increases. If the same behaviour is found to hold true for other forms of investment (either cross-border or domestic), it would have far-reaching implications. It has for instance been argued that the recent financial crisis found its roots in an excess supply of liquidity resulting in investors turning
To riskier investments. The results of the present study suggest a similar behaviour of direct investment despite political risk. Findlay (1978) postulates that foreign direct
Investment increases the rate of technical progress in the host country through a
‘Contagion’ effect from the more advanced technology, management practices, etc.
Used by the foreign firms.Wang (1990) incorporates this idea into a model more in
Line with the neoclassical growth framework, by assuming that the increase in
‘Knowledge’ applied to production is determined as a function of foreign direct
Investment (FDI). Technology diffusion can take place through a variety of channels that involve
The transmission of ideas and new technologies. Imports of high-technology
Products, adoption of foreign technology and acquisition of human capital through
Various means are certainly important conduits for the international diffusion of
3 technologies. Our empirical results imply that FDI is more
Productive than domestic investment only when the host country has a minimum
Threshold stock of human capital. E. Borensztein, J. De Gregorio, J-W. Lee (1998)
By year-end 2010, the latest year for which detailed data are available, foreign firms employed
Almost 6 million Americans, less than 4% of the U.S. civilian labour force, and owned over 33,000
Individual business establishments.5 Foreign firms have a direct investment presence in every
State. Employment of these firms ranges from over 636,000 in California, to about 7,700 in South
Dakota. Following California, New York (459,600), Texas (455,200), Pennsylvania (285,300),
Illinois (263,800), New Jersey (256,700), and Florida (239,500) have the largest numbers of
Residents employed by foreign firms. In 2010, 36% of the foreign firms’ employment was in the
Manufacturing sector, more than twice the share of manufacturing employment in the U.S.
Economy as a whole, with average annual compensation (wages and benefits) per worker of about
$76,000.
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。