h focus on the area of EU language policy but less on empirical studies, so that there are many unanswered questions remain. In order to fill the gap, the author carries out an empirical study to show the use of English in scientific communication at the university in Denmark. By analyzing the questionnaires filled by tenured professors and lecturers, the author concludes that English usage is strengthening in Danish higher education; however, there is a need for academic policymakers and gatekeepers to pursue more active, explicit, and equitable language policies (作者名字,年代:页码).
In the last chapter, it draws a conclusion that English and other languages should be treated equally within a reasonable range.
Linguistic Imperialism, Globalism, and the English Language
In Linguistic Imperialism, Globalism, and the English Language, the author analyzes the wild use of English language and holds the idea that the phenomenal growth of English is more a result of globalism rather than linguistic or cultural imperialism.
This paper is divided into three chapters: Introduction, Case Study and Globalism and the English Language. In the introduction part, the author expatiates that, when facing the choices of the official languages, some former colonies chose English as one of their official languages. However, some professionals questioned that the continuous usage of English might become a tool for those ex-colonial masters to maintain their economic, cultural and political dominance beyond independence.
Then the paper presents some remar
本
论文由
英语论文网www.51lunwen.org整理提供kable literatures at the end of 20th centuries which regard the maintenance of a former colonial language (or the use of English language) as linguistic imperialism: Phillipson (年代,页码) holds that the use of English in the developing countries is equated to the imposition of the cultural, social, emotional, and linguistic norms of the dominating society onto the dominated society. Pennycook (年代,页码) also claims that English is a remnant of western imperialism, operating globally in conjunction with capitalist forces; especially those of operations of multinational corporations. Besides being the language of science and economic advancement, English is also the language of unequal distribution of wealth.
In the Case study part, the author explains the concept linguistic imperialism as “ascribes too muck power to the language, as opposed to the language policy makers and the language users” (author,页码,年代). He takes Singapore as an example to illustrate his idea that the early dominance of English in Singapore is a result of its leader’s conscious decision after the consideration of world trends and local conditions. At the beginning of the section, it analyzes Singapore’s situations as: having many distinct races and cultures, a multicultural community, being poor, having a rapidly rising birth-rate and possessing few prospects for economic survival and depending largely on an external trade, etc. Therefore, when many countries teach their children more than one language, Singapore determines to educate its population English. This decision was made by Singapore government for the purpose of attracting foreign investment, giving the society the leading edge in education, academic achievement, international trade, and business. The choice of English is a pragmatic realization by the Singapore government, since it is the world's foremost auxiliary language, which is widely
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。