英语论文网

Have the forces of globalization and transnationalism effectively eliminated the power of the state?
1.0 Introduction
At the end of last century, the globalization and transnationalism swept the world. The globalization and transnationalism had influenced deeply 代写留学生论文many aspects, such as politics, economy, law, and culture. Moreover, the globalization and transnationalism rebuilt the pattern of state and international society in a great extent. Under the new situations, the state sovereignty had new meaning in the international law. Some people thought that the forces of globalization and transnationalism effectively eliminated the state sovereignty. As a result, it was worth discussing if the globalization and transnationalism transfer state sovereignty or sovereign rights, what was the relationship between state sovereignty and sovereign rights, and how conducted its relationship in order to adapt to the situation of globalization and transnationalism. Clear up these problems would help to tell if the forces of globalization and transnationalism effectively eliminated the state sovereignty. Moreover, it was useful to defend state sovereignty effectively and gain more benefits in the process of international communications and cooperation.
2.0 The meaning of globalization and transnationalism
3.0 Sovereignty theory
3.1 Several theories which denied sovereignty
3.2 The new development of sovereignty theory
4.0 The sovereignty and sovereign rights 
4.1 The difference of sovereignty and sovereign rights
4.2 The relationship between limiting and transferring sovereign rights and insisting power of state
5.0 Limiting and transferring sovereign rights can not eliminate the power of state
6.0 Conclusion7.0 References:
Alan Hudson. (2000), ‘Offshoreness, Globalization and Sovereignty: A Postmodern Geo-Political Economy?’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol . 25, 3 pp. 269-283.

BRENDA CHALFIN. (2008), ‘Sovereigns and Citizens in close Encounter: Airport Anthropology and Customs Regimes in Neoliberal Ghana’, American Ethnologist, Vol. 35, 4 pp. 519-538.

Christine Min Wotipka, Kiyoteru Tsutsui. (2008), ‘Global Human Rights and State Sovereignty: State Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties, 1965–2001’, Sociological Forum, 23，4 pp. 724-754.

Diane Stone. (2008), ‘Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and Their Networks’, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 36, 1 pp.19-38.

Edward S. Cohen. (2001), ‘Globalization and the Boundaries of the State: A Framework for Analyzing the Changing Practice of Sovereignty’, Governance, Vol. 14, 1 pp.75-97.

Gwen Gustafson Scott. (2003), ‘Situating Fijian Transmigrants: towards Racialised Transnational Social Spaces of the Undocumented’, International Journal of Population Geography, Vol. 9, 2 pp.181-198.

Helen Thompson. (2006), ‘The Modern State and its Adversaries’, Government and Opposition, Vol. 41, 1  pp.23-42.

Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff. (2005), ‘Digital Diasporas and Governance in Semi-authoritarian States: the Case of the Egyptian Copts’, Public Administration and Development, Vol. 25, 3 pp.193-204.

Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff. (2004), ‘Digital Diasporas and International Development: Afghan-Americans and the Reconstruction of Afghanistan’, Public Administration and Development, Vol. 24, 5 pp.397-413.

John Mikler. (2008), ‘Sharing Sovereignty for Glo本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。