英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

加拿大政治学论文Is it true that our varying conceptions of the good are irrelevant from the standpoing of justice?

论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:课程作业 Coursework登出时间:2013-07-04编辑:tinkle点击率:2733

论文字数:2370论文编号:org201307041003299740语种:英语 English地区:加拿大价格:$ 33

关键词:加拿大政治学论文justicegood

摘要:加拿大政治学论文Is it true that our varying "conceptions of the good are irrelevant from the standpoing of justice?",论文可以摘抄,但是一定能够要注明出处。

论文题目:加拿大政治学论文Is it true that our varying "conceptions of the good are irrelevant from the standpoing of justice?"
论文语种:英文
您的研究方向:政治
是否有数据处理要求:否
您的国家:加拿大
您的学校背景:
要求字数:2300
论文用途:本科课程论文
是否需要盲审(博士或硕士生有这个需要):否
补充要求和说明:可能会用到的reading John Rawls," A theory of justice" Charles Taylor, "Atomism" 可以有些中国式的语法错误,绝不能抄袭

加拿大政治学论文Is it true that our varying "conceptions of the good are irrelevant from the standpoing of justice?"

1.0 Introduction

Charles Taylor and John Rawls both are extraordinary philosophical theorists in humans’ developing history. Rawls’ outstanding work A theory of justice is among https://www.51lunwen.org/politics/ the most influential masterpieces in 20th century. In this book, Rawls came up with a concept which integrates western justice theories and enrich the social justice theory, namely “Justice as fairness”. Injustice laws and systems should be reformed no matter how effective they are. He also points out that justice should be closely related to social cooperation.

查尔斯泰勒和约翰罗尔斯都是非凡的哲学理论在人类的发展史。罗尔斯的杰出工作的正义理论是在第二十世纪最具影响力的杰作之一。在这本书中,罗尔斯想出了一个概念,结合西方正义理论和丰富的社会正义理论,即“作为公平的正义”。不公正的法律和制度必须改革,不管他们是有效的。他还指出,司法的社会合作密切相关。
Taylor was born in 1931 in Quebec, and got a doctor degree in Oxford, who is now teaching in American Northwest University. This critique aims at finding out analysing the theories of Johan Rawls and Charles Taylor, giving an answer to the question whether it is true that out varying “conceptions of the good are irrelevant from the standpoint of justice”, and considering the main arguments being presented by the two authors regarding the issue of the state's proper connection to the 'conceptions of the good' of citizens, and presenting what’s considered to be the most important objections that can be raised against the arguments of the authors.

2.0 Analysis


3.0 Conclusion

“Justice as fairness” is thought to be a common concept of a complete and sustaining social cooperate system. Rawls takes the social contract theory of Locke, Rousseau and Kant as a foundation, analysing the moral values of western democratic society and opposing the traditional utilitarianism, and he thinks justice as the main virtues of social systems, just like the truth to the ideology. Taylor employs the word “atomism” to express the fundamental characteristics of new liberalism, and discussed the conflict of explanation in negative freedom and justice disparity on the basis of the critics of atomism. It should be noted that the justice described by Rawls is concerned with social systems instead of justice of individual behaviours in ethical morality, which is important to know, because the difference between ethic morality and social systems are immensely different. As a justice issue of social systems, this is an issue about whether a system is justice. Evaluation of individual morality could be lifted up to the moral level, and the ultimate evaluation is “justice”, there is no better assessment of social system.

4.0 References


Gordon, David (2008-07-28) Going Off the Rawls, The American Conservative

John Locke, A Letter Concerning https://www.51lunwen.org/politics/ Toleration, ed. James H. Tully (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1983

Joshua Cohen and Thomas Nagel, "John Rawls: On My R论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/2 页首页上一页12下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非