为了仔细看看“不问不说”(DADT)政策,本文应该看看历史,目标和一些政策的基本理念。之后,会有一些与“不要问相关的关键问题的审查,不说相关的关键问题的审查”政策,在不同的服务模式看,和一对夫妇可以做这种政策变化的探讨。
政策和规划
当今最具争议的政策的,在美国,是“不问,不说”政策。该政策被称为“不问,不说”是正式的联邦法律。这是美国前总统比尔•克林顿(burrelli,2009)1993年11月30日颁布的。“不要问,不要说”政策,允许同性恋和双性恋者在军队中服役。然而,这一政策不允许他们公开服务。在分解的政策,必须看四个独立的部分:不要问,不要说,不要追求,不要骚扰。
In order to take a closer look at the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' (DADT) policy, this paper shall look at the
history, goals and some of the underlying philosophies of the policy. Following, there will be a review of some of the critical issues associated with the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy, a look at different service delivery models, and a discussion of a couple of changes that could be done to this policy.
Policy and Programming
One of today's most controversial policy's, in the United States, is the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy. The policy known as 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' is officially federal law Pub. L. 103-160 (10 U.S.C.? ?§? 654), that was enacted November 30th, 1993 by former President Bill Clinton (Burrelli, 2009). The 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy allows for homosexual and bisexual persons to serve in the military. However, this policy does not allow for them to serve openly. When breaking down the policy, it must be looked at in four separate sections: Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue, Don't Harass.
The history of the don't ask, don't tell policy finds its roots further back in history than what is thought. A previous policy existed known as the Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual & Transgender (LGBT) Policy: under the LGBT policy service members were issued blue discharges or 'blue tickets'. A blue discharge was an administrative military discharge issued by the United States starting in 1916 (Berube, 1990). It was not considered to be honorable or dishonorable, in present day it would be considered more of a 'general' type of discharge. This type of discharge became the choice for military leaders seeking to remove homosexual service members from the United States Military and they were issued more often to African American service members in a disproportionate rate (Berube, 1990). These types of discharges were discontinued in May 1947, with service members being discharged under either, 'general' and 'undesirable'(Berube, 1990). Under this system, a service member found to be homosexual, but has not committed any actual acts of homosexuality, would receive an undesirable discharge. Service members who actually engaged in homosexual conduct were dishonorably discharged (Berube, 1990).
In the Late 20th century this policy took on a new look. By the 1970s, 'a gay service member who had not committed any homosexual acts while in service would tend to receive a general discharge, while those found to have engaged in homosexual conduct would tend to receive undesirable discharges'(Jones, 1973). However, the reality remained that homosexual service members were receiving a disproportionate percentage of undesirable discharges, when compared to there heterosexual counterparts (Shilts, 1993).
During the 1970s, there were many high-profile court cases that challenged the regulations on how the military deals with service members when homosexuality occurred. A ne
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。