英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

难民,跨国和国家 [7]

论文作者:Khalid Koser论文属性:硕士毕业论文 dissertation登出时间:2016-05-03编辑:anne点击率:23073

论文字数:9626论文编号:org201605021332486612语种:英语 English地区:澳大利亚价格:免费论文

关键词:难民跨国主义国家临时保护

摘要:三案例研究的形式对本文实证的重点*人的临时保护欧洲的年代,寻求庇护者向欧洲走私,和贡献厄立特里亚跨国社区在国内冲突后重建。

international refugee regime. First, it is important to recognise that ‘temporary protection’ emerged as a political compromise. UNHCR felt compelled to promote temporary protection because of concerns that otherwise states would refuse admission to Bosnians. For states, this new policy had a number of advantages: normal asylum procedures were circumvented so that no additional strain was added to the asylum system; public support could be maintained by stressing the temporary nature of the status, and repatriation was considered an easier and less disruptive solution than is often the case for refugees as no formal process had to be initiated to withdraw status. Most importantly, ‘temporary protection’ was not a status enshrined in international law, but instead was located within national legal and administrative edicts. All decisions  
240 K. Koser concerning the granting and removal of the status were firmly within the executive power of the state, rather than being subject to binding international agreements such as the Geneva Convention. Second, while it is true that at least initially no effort was made to distinguish between ‘genuine’ refugees and other migrants, this distinction later formed the main criterion in several countries for the transferral of the status of Bosnians to permanent residence rights. In all of these countries, those Bosnians who did not satisfy the criteria for refugee status were repatriated. Furthermore, the observation that the majority of Bosnians did satisfy the criteria for refugee status begs the question why were they not granted refugee status via a summary procedure upon arrival? To provide basic rights under ‘temporary protection’ to ‘genuine refugees’ is an improvement upon incarcerating them during a lengthy asylum procedure, but, objectively, is hardly evidence for fulfilling a humanitarian obligation. Finally, of course, the majority of Bosnians in Europe, whether or not they were ‘genuine’ refugees, were repatriated *sometimes by force*as they were located in Germany where no provision was made for their status to be examined or transmuted. Third, in those countries where Bosnians were not processed via the asylum procedure, one of the most prevalent sets of criteria for transferring status related to economic integration, in the form of regular employment and private accommodation. In other words, only those Bosnians who had integrated in the labour market were accepted on a permanent basis*those who represented a strain on the public purse were not. The implication is that state interests, rather than a broader international responsibility, largely determined the response to Bosnians in the EU. A fourth reason for scepticism that ‘temporary protection’ represented a ‘new departure’ for European states arises from analysis of its evolution since the Bosnian displacement. What is particularly striking is that, even though the status was enshrined in national systems by the time of the conflict in Kosovo towards the end of the 1990s, very few displaced Kosovars were granted ‘temporary protection’ in EU states, despite the fact that their circumstances were broadly comparable to those of the Bosnians before them (Koser 2000a). Instead they were maintained in refugee camps in neighbouring Macedonia, and those who did reach Western Europe were entered into the asylum procedure. Neither of course has ‘temporary protection’ been extended to other asylum-seekers who have continued to 论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。
英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非