英语论文网

ggins, 2004: 144). Legal publicity andeducation is, in the linguistic sense, a process of exchanging information. Thegovernment and legal professionals are the givers of the information, i.e. the legalknowledge, and that information is given through language, either it be written or oralto the receiver, in this case, the migrant workers. So the media, through which thelegal knowledge is passed to the receiver, is also of great importance.Scholars have made some effort to study the language used in legal publicity andeducation from linguistic perspectives. The present studies can be divided into twodifferent aspects.
.......

CHAPTER THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK..........16
3.1 Speech Act Theory......16
3.2 Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)..........20
3.3 Theoretical Framework of this Paper............21
CHAPTER FOUR METHODOLOGY..........29
4.1 Research Procedures............29
4.2 The Linguistic Revisions of LPE Language..........29
CHAPTER FIVE THE EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH....... 38
5.1 The Research Purpose......... 38
5.2 Research Subject.........38
5.3 Research Method........ 38
5.4 Research Material.......38
5.5 Experimental Design...........39
5.6 Measurement Tool...... 39
5.7 Experimental Method..........40
5.8 Research Procedure.... 40

CHAPTER SIXGENERAL DISCUSSION

6.1 Discussion about the Original LPE Document

During the investigation of several migrant workers, we asked them to read the LPEdocument used in this study, 94% of them have reported the following opinions aboutthe document:(1) The language used in this document is too formal, and it is hard for them toconcentrate on reading it for a long time, let alone remembering it by heart;(2) The way to address the target readers as “Peasant Workers” is mentally offensive,which makes them feel alienated from the legal authorities;(3) The arrangement is not so clear; the readers cannot find what they really need toknow very easily;(4) Some of the stipulations are ambiguous, and it didn’t provide further explanation.In order to modify this document, we need to know the present legal cognition ofthe target readers, i.e. the NGMWs. With Reference to some relevant studies, we knowour target readers are in lack of confidence in legal systems and they can not find asense of belonging from the legal system.On the basis of the above findings, this paper revises the original documentsfrom the following perspectives:(1) Language. Use casual language in the introductory part of the text. Address thereaders with friendly deixis.(2) Structure. Arrange the document in the order of the need of NGMWs.(3) Content. Add some case studies and illustrations to further explain some importantstipulations to make it easy to understand.The experimental research later proved the revision is effective for improving thelegal cognition of NGMWs.

........

CONCLUSION

Firstly, up to now, there are not many researches about the linguistic features of theLPE written texts. This study analyzes the linguistic features of it from the perspectiveof illocutionary force which should be the main concern of this functional language.We have found that the poor illocutionary force of the present LPE documents is dueto the following linguistic reasons: over-objective, loosely organized and lack ofpractical本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。