英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

研究英国公司的治理发展

论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2016-03-04编辑:zhaotianyun点击率:6455

论文字数:2126论文编号:org201603011842399977语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:免费论文

关键词:Corporate governance财务报告英国公司

摘要:摘要:本文主要讲述并总结了英国公司的治理发展和对公司的治理规范。

研究英国公司的治理发展
Examining Corporate Governance developments in the UK


英国公司治理发展的总结如下:

最初在英国公司的治理发展始于1980年代末和1990年代初,在波利等公司丑闻之后,例如派克和麦克斯韦。财务报告违规行为导致“金融方面的公司治理委员会”的成立,由先生阿德里安·吉百利引领。由此产生的吉百利报告发表于1992年,提出一些建议在分离组织的首席执行官和董事长的角色,平衡组成的董事会,选择过程为非执行董事,财务报告的透明度和良好的内部控制的必要性。吉百利的报告包含一个代码最佳实践及其建议纳入伦敦证券交易所的上市规则。

吉百利之后,建立了一个“内部控制工作小组”向企业提供指导如何遵守原则4.5吉百利代码”报道公司的内部控制系统的有效性。这导致Rutteman报告在1994年出版的“内部控制和财务报告”。

1995年,随着对董事的薪酬和股票期权,Greenbury报告建议广泛在年报披露薪酬并建议设立薪酬委员会组成的非执行董事。再一次,大多数的被认可上市规则的建议。

Hampel委员会1996年1月,成立审查的程度吉百利和Greenbury报告已经实现,目标是否被满足。Hampel报告导致的出版的公司治理联合准则》(1998),涵盖了有关结构和操作的董事会,董事的报酬、问责制和审计,与机构股东的关系,和机构股东的责任。

英国公司治理发展的总结如下:——Corporate governance developments in the UK are summarised as follows:

Initial corporate governance developments in the UK began in the late 1980s and early 1990s in the wake of corporate scandals such as Polly Peck and Maxwell. Financial reporting irregularities led to the establishment of the 'Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance Committee' led by Sir Adrian Cadbury. The resulting Cadbury Report published in 1992 outlined a number of recommendations around the separation of the role of an organisation's chief executive and chairman, balanced composition of the board, selection processes for non-executive directors, transparency of financial reporting and the need for good internal controls. The Cadbury Report included a Code of Best Practice and its recommendations were incorporated into the Listing Rules of the London Stock Exchange.

Following Cadbury, a 'Working Group on Internal Control' was established to provide guidance to companies on how to comply with Principle 4.5 of the Cadbury Code 'reporting on the effectiveness of the company's system of internal control'. This led to the publication of the Rutteman Report in 1994 on 'Internal Control and Financial Reporting'.

In 1995, following concerns about directors' pay and share options, the Greenbury Report recommended extensive disclosure in annual reports on remuneration and recommended the establishment of a remuneration committee comprised of non-executive directors. Again, the majority of the recommendations were endorsed by the Listing Rules.

In January 1996, the Hampel Committee was established to review the extent to which the Cadbury and Greenbury Reports had been implemented and whether the objectives had been met. The Hampel Report led to the publication of the Combined Code of Corporate Governance (1998) covering areas relating to structure and operations of the board, directors' remuneration, accountability and audit, relations with institutional shareholders, and the responsibilities of institutional shareholders.

The 1998 Combined Code applied to all listed companies from 31 December 1998 until reporting years commencing on or after 1 November 2003 until it was superseded by the revised Code in 2003. It was appended to Listing Rule 12.43A requiring companies to provide in their annual reports a narrative statement of how they have applied the Code principles and state that they have complied with the Code provisions or, if not, why not and for what period.

Part of the 1998 and 2003 Combined Codes required companies to provide a statement in their annual report on how they have applied the Code Principle and Code Pro论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/5 页首页上一页12345下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非