英语论文网

英国essay：全球化与非正式劳动力市场的扩大
Globalization links with expansion of informal labour markets

文章论述了在亚洲，非正规劳动占主导地位的方式。在过去的几十年中，资本的流动性和开放的国家市场的贸易和外国直接投资往往特权资本，可以迅速通过各个领域。另一方面，工党不能自由地从一个地区转移到另一个地区。利润的社会需要生产的生产处于从属地位导致了劳动力的重组变得更加灵活以满足流动资本的特殊需要。这样，资本主义劳动成为了亚洲人民生活的共同基础（常，2009），在这种情况下，工人被剥夺了任何形式的保护。虽然本文没有产生革命性的见解，它把重点放在资本主义和劳动阶级之间的斗争，因为它是在现代术语的形状，这是相关的，在我看来，我的分析的一个中心点。它还提出了资本转化的过程，因此，在亚洲的劳动，非常反映了世界各地正在发生的这种转变。本文分析了动作的协调，跨国资本形态的劳动力市场导致越来越多的信息化过程中的一个广泛的地理区域的影响。我认为这是我的研究的一个很好的起点，因为它是处理资本主义劳动改造探索各种形式的非正式工作成果。

The first article by Chang deals with the way in which informal labour has become dominant in Asia. During the last decades the mobility of capital and the opening of the national markets to trade and to foreign direct investment have tended to privilege capital that could move swiftly through various areas. On the other hand, labour could not move freely from one area to another. The subordination of the production for social needs to production for profit has lead to the reorganization of labour that became more flexible in order to satisfy the particular needs of mobile capital. In this way, capitalist labour became the common basis of living for people in Asia (Chang, 2009) and in this context workers were deprived of any kind of protection. While this paper produces no revolutionary insights, it puts under focus the struggle between the capitalist and the labour class as it is shaped in modern terms and this is relevant, and in my opinion a central point of my analysis. It also presents the process of transformation of capital and, consequently, of labour in Asia that very much reflects the kind of transformation that is happening all over the world. The paper analyzes the impact of the action of the transnationally co-ordinated capital that shapes labour markets leading to an increasing informalisation process in a broad geographic area. I think that this is a good starting point for my research since it is dealing with the transformation of capitalist labour exploring various forms of informal work outcomes.

The second article by Peterson treats informalization of labour as a systemic phenomenon of contemporary globalization and focuses on the links between economic processes, inequalities, governance gaps and global insecurities (Peterson, 2010). The author approaches informality from a variety of perspectives and proposes to integrate the insights of the various types of analysis (mainstream, structuralist, feminist) to better cope with the economic, analytical and political problems caused by informality. He also relates the processes of informalization to the phenomenon of international migration. Although this article doesna€™t provide an explicit definition of the informal sector, it understands formal and informal activities as interdependent, and overlapping along a continuum. Informalization is both a constant and a cyclical feature of capitalist relations. Those are key points of my own analysis and therefore I believe that using a more integrated framework of investigation, as the author proposes, I will be able to understand better and more comprehensively the links between globalization and the processes of informalization.

The third article by M. Chen describes the historical evolution of the concept a€œinformal labouraand gives different definitions with various characteristics for statistical use. It is very important that in the final definition prior