英语论文网

1.1 Project overview
Translation is a linguistic activity, trying to deliver speech or written article from onelanguage into another one. It not only includes the content but also the form. Thereproduction of the original content refers to the surface meaning and the extended meaning;whereas the form refers to pronunciation, vocabulary and sentence instruction. All that shouldbe taken into consideration during translation in order to convey the idea of original workfully and correctly.Translation can never be an easy task, especially when the texts are full of historyevents, cultural backgrounds, idioms etc. Take Chinese to English translation as an example.Because of the inherited differences between Chinese and English language, it is difficult forthe translator to fully take in the original idea of the author without any deviation since hefirst of all is a reader himself and his understanding is supposed to take on personalizedopinion when there can be a thousand of Hamlet in a thousand of people.A good translator is someone who has a comprehensive knowledge of both source andtarget languages. He should be familiar with the culture, customs, and social settings of thesource and target language speakers. He should also be familiar with different registers, stylesof speaking, and social stratification of both languages. In actual translation, diversetranslation techniques are adopted by the translator. The aim of this paper is to take HowardGoldblatt's Wolf Totem as an example so that we can try to figure out how he uses theoriesand techniques to make his translation smooth，especially how he taps the concept ofcoherence and cohesion into his translation of Jiang Rong's Lang Tu Teng,Cohesion in English by M.A.K. Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan, first published in 1976,has inspired the interest in the concept of cohesion among discourse linguists. Grammar andgrammatical sentential sequence no longer take up the whole attention of linguists whereasmeaning has been bidding for more in-depth analysis. The realization of the meaning of asingle text relies on the cohesive relations of each sentence with others. The cohesiverelations, in Halliday and Hasan's term, are referred to as ties, which are classified into fivecategories, i.e. reference, substitution，ellipsis, conjunction, and lexical cohesion. Hallida)and Hasan's theoretical groundwork foreshadows the following researchers' arguments on therole of cohesion in the formation of discourse and text. Among these researchers, there artsome who question the point of view proposed by Halliday and Hasan that coherence can Ixrealized by the cohesion ties without recourse to the extra-linguistic factors, such as KarerFeathers (1981), Tanen, Morgan, Sellner, etc. They believe that cohesion is not just an equa^concept to coherence but an epiphenomenon of content coherence and a factor o]constructing coherence. And based on empirical research, some scholars such as Tieraey andMosenthal，Freedoby and Anderson, and Steffensen who further demonstrate the point thaicohesion is not same as coherence,. It is worth mentioning one researcher, Steffemsen whcsuggests that coherence is realized in the reader's understanding of the interacting process oisociocultural background and discourse text. Therefore, we first need to know clearly thediffere本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。