英语论文网

Competitiveness Distance Of Aec Member States Economics Essay
AEC竞争力

几次比赛的报告已经完成，但本文将使得它越来越完善。本文将使现有的报告增加，并提出解释国家竞争力的距离，相对于国家的竞争力距离的竞争力指标方面来考虑。为此，本文介绍了在经济和竞争的发展阶段而言的AEC成员国竞争力的距离。此外，本文从两个同时进行的国家来源的报告进行数据的分析。最后，比较竞争力的距离的分析结果之间的差异。自始至终，这两种分析框架，本文展示竞争力的影响的距离对于处于等价的竞争力水平的几个不同层次的国家是非常有用的。

经济中的国际贸易和自然资源的分配将是有效率的，当生产和国际贸易是基于比较优势的经济体系，其比较优势是指一国商品和服务的竞争力比其他国家生产成本低（巴拉萨和贝拉，1964年）。国家竞争力是衡量国家在创建和维护的环境中的相对能力，哪些业务可以提高提供财富水平的竞争力（高，吴，谢，王，林，陈，2008）。

Report as several competitions is already, but the article makes it increasingly satisfying. This paper will enable increased the existing reports and suggests explain distances of national competitiveness, when compared to competitiveness distance of the country to consider in terms of the competitiveness indicators. This purpose this paper explains competitiveness distances of AEC member states in terms of the stage of development of the economy and competition. In addition, this paper reports to the analysis of data from two simultaneously the national sources. Finally, compare the difference between the results of the analysis of competitiveness distances. Throughout, these both analytical framework, this paper demonstrates the impact of competitiveness distances that useful for several different levels of national competitiveness which AEC member states are equivalent for competitiveness level.

International trade and natural resources allocation within the economy will be efficiency, when production and international trade are based on the advantage with comparison of the economic system, which the comparative advantage refers to the competitiveness of a country to goods and services as producing to lower cost than other countries (Balassa, and Bela, 1964). Country competitiveness is a measure of relative capabilities country to create and maintain an environment, which business can be competitive in order to provide a level of wealth can be improved (Kao, Wu, Hsieh, Wang, Lin, and Chen, 2008). Throughout, in the increasingly open and integrate world economy that competitiveness has become a central enchantment of both the advancing and developing countries (Porter, 1990). Thus, how to manage an effective diamond strategic that model used to analyze the competitiveness of the industry (Korkmaz and Messner, 2008). But it looks like, there is no agreed definition of country competitiveness, which scholars different disciplines often to problem from different point of view (Krugman, 1996; Buckley, Pass, and Prescott, 1988) competitiveness firm levels is clear that firm in a competitive market and it is measured by market share or profitability (Krugman and Hatsopoulus, 1987). In addition, ignore occurring market share sales of foreign affiliates and license sales abroad that since exports only is considered on profitability, study of Blaine (1993) in the 1980, Japan and U.S. when firms indicated that its highly profitable does not necessarily lead to competitive industries or countries as well as the opposite is true of many US firms remained profitable, although a strong decreasing of both the industry and the U.S. economy; on the other hand, most Japanese firms are still not taking advantage of the relative competitiveness of the Japanese economy even more. For these reasons, the competitiveness at the national level cannot be measured in the same way at the firm level. All efforts, definition of OECD (19