英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

英国留学生代写作业:commercial law [2]

论文作者:留学生论文论文属性:职称论文 Scholarship Papers登出时间:2011-03-31编辑:zn1987点击率:5666

论文字数:1199论文编号:org201103311140278625语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:免费论文

关键词:Company lawInternational Business Lawcommercial law

ification of the register of members *J.B.L. 721 and the modified
compulsory purchase or “squeeze-out” provisions by which minority shareholders may be forced to
exit companies subject to a 90 per cent or more successful takeover bid.
Chapter 4 reviews the insolvency law-based unjust and equitable winding-up petition and reviews the
relationship between https://www.51lunwen.org/liuxuelunwendx/it and unfair prejudice, the remedies, practice and procedure relevant to which
are expounded in Chs 5 and 6. Although the 2006 Act has made no substantive changes to unfair
prejudice petitions, case law continues to grow apace. The recent case of Hawkes v Cuddy,
1
also
known as Neath Rugby Ltd, Re, judgment on the main hearing of which (rather than the summary
judgment) came a matter of days too late for inclusion in the text, demonstrates the problematic
nature of a certain type of unfair prejudice case. The five-day summary hearing (which was
appealed, adding further costs and court time) was followed by a three-week hearing, all relating to
shares valued at no more than £97,000. It stands as a clear illustration that reason does not always
underpin such petitions. The dispute arose out of what the judge described as a “spectacular falling
out” resulting in costs being incurred far in excess of the value of the claim. It is unfortunate that these
fact-intensive disputes continue to come before the courts rather than being settled or decided using
alternative dispute resolution techniques.
The penultimate chapter, on directors' duties, introduces the reader to the new statutory general
duties of directors in ss.171-177 of the 2006 Act. Although a breach of directors' duties must underpin
all derivative claims and is usually a feature of unfair prejudice petitions, inclusion of so brief a
review, limited to the general duties, is of questionable value, particularly to the main audience for the
book. The final chapter, on taxation, at three pages, simply reminds the reader of the critical role
taxation plays in the decision to litigate, the choice of remedies to seek, whether or not to accept an
offer or settlement and the structuring of a settlement.
As indicated above, the forms, precedents and CPR extracts included in the appendices are a great
strength of the book. Appendix 2 also contains extracts from statutes. The criteria used for inclusion
of sections of the Companies Act 2006 are not always obvious and there are some puzzling
omissions. With a new chapter on directors' duties, one might have expected to find the new statutory
general duties of directors, yet ss.171-177 are not included. Neither, more oddly, are ss.260-264, the
new derivative claim sections of the Act.
To question or challenge the law is not the aim of the authors. Some very helpful references to journal
articles critiquing the law are made at pertinent points but the law is largely stated in a straightforward
way as enacted, or declared and developed by the courts. In this, the authors demonstrate admirable
writing skill and if at times the succinct style adopted is not wholly conducive to understanding, this is
an inevitable consequence of the book having been kept to a sensible length. To illustrate, it is stated
in the brief discussion of shareholders' agreements in Ch.2 that an agreement between all of the
members of a company which has the effect of altering t论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。
英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非