留学生国际法作业 [6]
论文作者:英语论文论文属性:短文 essay登出时间:2014-09-16编辑:zcm84984点击率:15891
论文字数:5866论文编号:org201409161258498904语种:英语 English地区:美国价格:免费论文
关键词:管辖权国际公海Law EssayInternational LawFlag State Jurisdiction缔约国
摘要:这是一篇关于国际公海上的船旗国管辖权的 Law Essay,这篇文章将重点关注国际上关于紧迫追击的公认的权利,以及追击驶入沿海国家的船只的权利和义务,(追击飞机不会包含在这里)。在这样约定的条件下使得公约有更广泛的意义,因为不再仅仅只是那些通过了公约的缔约国要受到这里所说的紧迫追击的权利的约束。
ssary measures in this regard. This guarantees the responsibility of a state for the actions made by its ships operating under the government. A state’s official connection to military aircrafts or warships needs not to be manifested since this connection is self-evident, thus, other pursuing vessels need to be specifically authorized by the state to exercise these measures. [32]
Commercial ships in government service as well as private ships are subject to the jurisdiction of the coastal state and can be pursued if there is good reason to believe that a violation of the laws have been made. However, it is not in accordance with international law to exercise hot pursuit against other states’ warships. These, together with other non-commercial ships operating under a foreign government, are generally immune from the jurisdiction of any state other than the flag state. Although these ships are excepted from a coastal state’s right of hot pursuit, this does obviously not mean that they do not have to follow the laws and regulations of the coastal state. The only immunity warships enjoy is the immunity from enforcement jurisdiction of the coastal state, so the flag state might have to answer for the violation made by one of its governmental ships. Furthermore, the coastal state may pursue and arrest warships and non-commercial ships in foreign government service in self-defense. [33]
4.3. Offences
The right of hot pursuit arises “whenever the offending ship has violated a law which has been validly enacted for the purpose of the zone where the offence has occurred” [34] . In order to be entitled to hot pursuit, the coastal state has to have good reason to believe that the foreign ship has made such an offence, or as it is stated in article 111 (1) UNCLOS: “violated the laws and regulations of that State” [35] . The article states no predefined offences, so what kind of offences does this actually refer to? There is in fact no limit of how severe the delict must be in order to entitle the state to hot pursuit. The coastal state is entitled to undertake hot pursuit as soon as any local law or regulation has been violated, no matter how trivial. The wording in article 111 UNCLOS allows hot pursuit whenever a law has been violated, no matter what the character of the offence is. [36] There has been a view that the right of hot pursuit should arise only in respect of certain kinds of offences which could be considered as quasi-international offences (such as security offences), but the predominant view at the time of the Geneva Conference was that there should be no catalogue restricting the right of hot pursuit to offences of a certain character. [37]
The seriousness of the offence should however be taken into account by the coastal state before starting a pursuit, so that the freedom of navigation is not hindered for minor offences. [38] This would otherwise result in a disproportionate exercise of power. [39] Furthermore, international comity and goodwill can be seen as important reasons why a coastal state should not exercise in response to trivial offences. Naturally, this principle of comity does not legally bind the coastal state to behave in a certain way, since it is not a principle under international law. In general, states are however anxious to submit to this principle of comity, since it is in their own best interest to show respect to other sovereign states. A state that
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。