英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

留学生医学法论文

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2014-09-17编辑:zcm84984点击率:14248

论文字数:4093论文编号:org201409161306403176语种:英语 English地区:美国价格:免费论文

关键词:法医科学家Law Essay法律系统法律定义

摘要:本文是一篇留学生医学法的论文,科学和法律因为其获得真相的共同目标而密切相关。他们主要的区别是他们实现目标的方式。法律系统引入了对手听证会,旨在获得公平、公正和社会可接受的结果。

留学生医法学论文


科学和法律因为其获得真相的共同目标而密切相关。他们主要的区别是他们实现目标的方式。法律系统引入了对手听证会,旨在获得公平、公正和社会可接受的结果[1]。与此相反的是,科学实现真理的方式是从经验而来,验证实验以实现目标[1]。科学采用描述性、法律采用规范性的方法来实现主要的目标,正是如此,法律定义了一个机构应该如何,而科学描述了这个机构实际是什么样子 [1]。


在20世纪之前,由于有限的科技资源和专业人士, 科学在法庭上很少涉及。自那时以来,科学和法律之间的关系一直在随着科学技术的快速进步而发展。随着科学在法庭上成为一个以法院的决定为基础的可靠的事实,科学开始在法庭上提出质疑。“人们会撒谎,但证据不会撒谎”使得科学成为法律体系中的一个重要的角色。

Obstacles To The Work Of Forensic Scientists Law Essay

Science and Law are closely related by their common objective of achieving the truth. The main difference is the way they attain it. The legal system introduced the adversary hearing, aiming to get a fair, just and socially acceptable outcome [1]. In contrast, science achieves truths from facts validated from experiments in an empirical sense [1]. Science adopts a descriptive and Law adopts a normative approach in fulfilling the main objective, providing that law defines how a body should be, but science describes what a body actually is[1].

Prior to 20th century, with limited scientific resources and professionals, science was rarely involved in the courtroom. Since then, the close relationship between science and law has been developing with the rapid advancement of scientific technologies. Science starts to be contested in the court with scientific evidences forming a reliable factual basis for courts’ decision. The fact that “People will lie, but evidences won’t lie” places science an important role in the legal system. From the court’s data in 2004-2005, the detection rate in the domestic burglary has increased from 15% to 45% with the involvement of DNA [2], showing that when including the scientific evidences, a higher probability is gained in searching the guilty and exonerating the innocent. Also, scientific practices impact on some legal definition such as embryo and life. The scientific practices are strictly regulated by law.

Forensic Science refers to the application of science in the context of legal issues, providing an answer to a legal question. The close relationship between Law and science are well established in forensics. Forensic Scientists are often required to analyze scientific evidences recovered from the crime scenes, to provide an interpretation of the results obtained from the analysis and present them in the courtroom. Their opinions of facts are to advise the whole court, indicating how science applies in court. In return, the admissibility of the evidences and the practice of forensic scientists are governed by legal rules, showing how law influences science.

2. Obstacles in the work of forensics

The misunderstanding to the reality of forensics by critics has long been established. In the Academics’ point of view, forensic sciences should be one of the academic sciences such as Chemistry or Physics, which can be explained in theory [3]. In reality, forensics is more like a practical approach in fulfilling the needs of the legal system [3]. This big difference between science in book and science in action leads to dispute between the critics and forensics. Together with the introduction of Daubert’s test in 1993, the admissibility of some scientific evidences such as fingerprints is challenged. Some new techniques such as the low copy number profiling of DNA has also been challenged of the lacking of peer-reviewed before it is introduce论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/8 页首页上一页1234567下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非