英语论文网

tried to circumvent or abrogate the treaty. This particular happening may be disingenuous to base a discussion about the future solely on history, but it may provide vital clue to entice a formula for the future.

 

Water Rationality.Water rationality use the premise that fresh water entwined with politics may help induce international cooperation even between hostile riparians in order to ensure continued water security. Water rationality has shown a number of examples in which “people who may not talk together about history or politics do, when their lives and economy depend on it, talk about water”. This particular example is corroborated by talks Syria and Iraq held after Turkey closed supply to these countries in January 1990. Turkey was filling the Ataturk Dam which was part of Southeast Anatolia Project. Situated downstream of Turkey on the Tigris and Euphrates River, Syria and Iraq – who viewed each other with hostility – met each other in an effort to join forces against Turkey on the issue of water. [11] Water unlike oil is not static and uniformly expensive. It is because water is scarce, vital, expensive, a security issue and demand is outstripping supply that countries are finding ways to cooperate to secure their supplies. There are potentially different ways in which countries can approach water security, but not all would prove politically feasible. For example, integrated water basin management may provide answer to the problems between India and Pakistan, but will Indian Political system plagued by terrorism exported from Pakistan be able to maintain its credibility by offering devolvement of powers to its arch rival Pakistan. Will manipulation of water as a strategic source to curry policies to its favor have a better chance against Pakistan which is becoming unmanageable each day is something which only time may answer in future.

 

Water Irrationality.Water irrationality is behavior by a state and its governing body that jeopardizes the long term quality and security of its water supply. Such policies are a manifestation of nationally, the inadvertent polluting of a water source or, internationally, the refusal to cooperate shared waters. National interests alone guide nations to either push policies towards conflict or strive to dissipate the war clouds and attempt reconciliation and push for policies towards peace. It may best be summarized in the quotes of Boulding “The national interest indeed is what the nation is interested in, particularly from the point of view of the major decision-makers, although these people cannot usually retain power unless their images are widely shared among the population” .

 

Pakistan is an apt example of this theory wherein even though it relies heavily upon irrigated agriculture but has reportedly made very little effort to employ better water management techniques. The agricultural sector as overall consumer of Indus Water Basin accounts for 98% of the total annual use. The IWT, through a succession of dams and link canals, allocated the basin’s water between India and Pakistan. Despite the proved fact that soil conditions would tolerate only a certain percent本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。