英语论文网

借助于语言学，我逐渐开始理解了，解构是一种策略，是一种能让我们理解到阅读材料最深处含义的方法。写作会损坏演讲当中的第一手智慧，因此它是很不好的替代品，如果思想观点能够在文章之外被重新解释，那么作者真正最初的思想就不能得到很好的传达。通过提炼出一些具有冲突性的逻辑观点，解构这篇文章，你就会发现，文章永远都不代表着它所说的意义，而也从来都不说出它想要表达的东西。

霍尔斯.米勒说，“解构并不是指文章结构的解散，而是要去证明它已经在消解自身。”

令这个理论更加扑朔迷离是，哲学家们常常使用建筑物来做比喻，但这些比喻我们又不能直接借助建筑运动来理解认知。

Reading of the material first produced by Derrida is hard, it seems that it is intended to be difficult, to make us feel inadequate and for the philosopher and his translators to seem clever than us, [1] in an attempt to make us accept but not question the theory and his genius. What is more, when asked what deconstruction is, Derrida replied “I have no simple and formalized response to this question. All my essays are attempts to have it out with this formidable question”. [2]

As I have come to understand it, based on linguistics, deconstruction is a strategy, a way of reading texts to get to the bottom of them. [3] It is said that writing corrupts first hand wisdom from speech and hence is a poor substitute, [4] that the true origin from the writer cannot be portrayed correctly when ideas can be formed out of context in reinterpretation, to take the text and deconstruct it by drawing out conflicting logics shows that text never really means what it says or says what it means. [5]

“Deconstruction is not a dismantling of the structure of a text but a demonstration that it has already dismantled itself.”J.Hillis Miller [6]

What makes the theory become all the more confusing is it seems that philosophers enjoy using architecture as a metaphor, and that these metaphors do not often directly translate to the architectural movement.

“Something has been constructed, a philosophical system, a tradition, a culture, and along comes a de-constructor (who) destroys it stone by stone, analyses the structure and dissolves it.. One looks at a system and examines how it was built, which keystone, which angle... supports the building; one shifts them and thereby frees oneself from the authority of the system” Derrida. [7]

So this architecture is based on the assumption that architecture is a language, (it can be read and seen to portray a culture, history, story and meaning -so why not?) and that this language is amendable to the methods of linguistic philosophy [8] , yet Derrida has insisted that despite appearances on the contrary deconstruction is not an architectural metaphor. [9] Indeed decons本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。