英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

According to the fact, it is possible for Walter to take legal action against Li and Qiang. In addition, after paying for Walter’s loss, Qiang has the right to take another legal action against Li for asking for his loss from Li’s misconduct.

论文作者:51lunwen论文属性:作业计算问题 Assignments:Questions, Math Problems登出时间:2008-09-04编辑:点击率:16006

论文字数:3001论文编号:org200809040720239643语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:$ 33

关键词:legal actionassignmentHong KongIndividual partnership

PART A - You must

Part A
Question 1
According to the fact, it is possible for Walter to take legal action against Li and Qiang. In addition, after paying for Walter’s loss, Qiang has the right to take another legal action against Li for asking for his loss from Li’s misconduct. Since the fact of this case is located in Hong Kong, relative laws of China will be applied in it. 

According to the Partnership Ordinance of Hong Kong, "Individual partnership" is the relation that subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit.  So the business entity in this case shall be individual partnership. In a partnership, “every partner in a firm is liable jointly with the other partners for all debts and obligations of the firm incurred while he is a partner; and after his death his estate is also severally liable in a due course of administration for such debts and obligations, so far as they remain unsatisfied but subject to the prior payment of his separate debts.”  According to this stipulation, it is Li and Qiang that should be responsible for the partnership’s action as an agency in the real estate transaction. So Li and Qiang are both defendants in the lawsuit. What is more, according to the Partnership Ordinance of Hong Kong, “Where, by any wrongful act or omission of any partner acting in the ordinary course of the business of the firm or with the authority of his co-partners, loss or injury is caused to any person not being a partner in the firm, or any penalty is incurred, the firm is liable to the same extent as the partner so acting or omitting to act.”  In the following cases, namely-(a) where one partner, acting within the scope of his apparent authority, receives the money or property of a third person and misapplies it; and (b) where a firm in the course of its business receives the money or property of a third person, and the money or property so received is misapplied by one or more of the partners while it is in the custody of the firm, the firm is liable to make good the loss.”  And “Every partner is liable jointly with his co-partners and also severally for everything for which the firm while he is a partner therein becomes liable under section 12 or 13.“  From the point of these stipulations, Li and Qiang should undertake joint liability for their partnership's debt to Walter. Also from this article, we can see that Qiang, if he will have overpaid his share of the partnership's debts shall have the right to claim compensation from the other partner: Li.

As for the relationship between Walter and Li & Qiang, they are in a commission. Or to say, there is a commission contract between them. A commission contract is a contract whereby the principal and the agent agree that the agent will handle principal's affairs.  So Walter is the principal and Li & Qiang is the agent. Then, “Under a commission contract for value, if the principal sustains any loss due to the fault of the agent, the principal may claim damages. Under a gratuitous agency appointment contract, if the principal sustains any loss due to the agent's intentional misconduct or gross negligence, the principal may claim damages. Where the agent acts beyond the scope of authorization, thereby causing loss to the principal, it shall pay damages.”  In this case, Li and his 论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/6 页首页上一页123456下一页尾页