英语论文网

议论文学术研究的变化

政治和经济利益团体对学术福利的干涉是影响大学学术研究经费变化的主要原因。虽然乍一看所做的会带来很多利益，但是纵观全局，这么做对世界各地很多大学和学院来说具有相当大的危害。一个更为严峻逐步恶化的情况正在发生，干涉者偏爱科学和工程学术领域，对社会、经济和政治发展起作用，但也影响了人文学科的发展研究。

对大学和学术基金运作的历史分析表明，在二战前这样的情况还并未发生。朱克曼和埃伦伯格观察发现，虽然人文学科学术研究经费一直都不多，但也没从未像现在这样少。过去的二十年中，对人文学科学术研究的拨款逐年减少。这是多么不幸的事，因为正如科学研究可以促进国家科学发展一样，人文学科学术研究可以帮助解决国家的社会经济问题。

Argumentative Essay on Changing University

One main factor, which has influenced changes in university funding, is the intrusion of political and financial interest groups in academic welfare. Although this could seem to be of many benefits at first glance, a closer look into the manner in which this is done demonstrates considerable harm in universities and colleges across the world. A more serious and ever increasing problem is the biased situation in which the social-economic-political influence of the intruders affects the humanity subjects in favor Sciences and Engineering.

Historical analysis of the functioning of the universities and academic funding indicate that, this had not been the case in the era before the World War II. Zuckerman and Ehrenberg observed that although the funding of humanities was never abundant, it has never been as scarce as it is currently. The last twenty years demonstrate the decrease in funding for humanities (Zuckerman and Ehrenberg). This is unfortunate because as much as the scientific research help in advancing the national scientific developments, academic humanities help in solving the national social-economic problems.

There are several excuses given in defense of the current change of events in higher learning institutions. One of them is the current rise of finances in undertaking a scientific research. The other reason is the shift of the lion’s share of academic funding to the universities and colleges leaving them with an option of outsourcing funds from other sources. However, the fundamental of these changes lies in; the less debated money making interest of certain characters in different areas. The main culprit is the corporate market which has noticed the weakness of governments and academic institutions in matters grants and funding for higher education. Nevertheless, this cannot be solely blamed on the marketing corporate. In his article, which bears part of its title as university wars, McMurtry clearly demonstrated the struggle between three dominant groups, which actively deny humanities the sufficient funding (McMurtry).

Of course, there is the commercial corporate in the middle of the three players which include the head of the academic institutions and government. The corporate institutions act according to the economic changes, technological advances and community lifestyle changes. This means, as the community places its emphasis in certain activities, the corporate markets take advantage of tapping into the learning institutions for research in that particular field. For instance, due to the increasing complex situation of health related issues; partly due to social-economic lifestyles, the society is much interested on health matters. This development is especially rampant in America and Canada where medical faculties dealing with mental illnesses like depression and stress, receive considerable funding. The patented researchers are as well highly regarded as they work for the interest of these corporate pretend to handle in favor o