英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

留学生政府债务作业范文参考

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:本科毕业论文 Thesis登出时间:2014-10-22编辑:yangcheng点击率:15199

论文字数:5703论文编号:org201409182323537527语种:英语 English地区:美国价格:免费论文

关键词:债务政府支出凯恩斯多重影响家用消费

摘要:本文是一篇留学生的政府债务论文,政府支出效应对于个人消费的冲击已经很长时间处于宏观经济政策的商榷的中心舞台。正如Tobin在1952年最初在一篇文章中发表的一样。

“一个社会仅仅通过本身引起债务的装置怎么可能,欺骗自己来相信它是更富有的社会呢?”难道不是有必要承担利息费用的附加税,减少了个人财产的其他组成部分的价值?(Tobin,1971)


政府支出效应对于个人消费的冲击已经很长时间处于宏观经济政策的商榷的中心舞台。正如Tobin在1952年最初在一篇文章中发表的一样。


凯恩斯领域的研究中最为基本的成就之一就是当时和未来的经济学家看待对于个人经济和个人成分的政府支出/活动的方式的重新形成。凯恩斯主义已经开始讨论关于政府支出和税收的宏观经济效应。拥有多种多样对于国家收入和最终的消费的增加的政府支出,其附加美元的概念开始被著名的“凯恩斯多重影响”所熟知。财政政策的设计和工作理念需要理解对于政府对于家用消费在产品和服务方面的购买/支出的影响


“How is it possible that a society merely by a device of incurring a debt to itself can deceive itself into believeing that it is wealthier ? Do not the additional taxes which are necessary to carry the interest charges reduce the value of other components of private wealth?”(Tobin 1971)

The effects of government spending shocks on private consumption have been at centre stage of the macroeconomic policy debate for quite a long time. As Tobin noted above in an article issued originally in 1952.

One of the most elementary achievements in the Keynesian field of study has been the re-formation of the way economists of the time and coming future view the impacts of government expenditure/activity on the private economy and its constituents. The Keynesian's started to talk about the macro-economic effects of government expenditure and taxation. The notion of an additional dollar of government expenditure having a manifold increase on national income and in turn consumption came to be known as the famous ‘Keynesian Multiplier Affect'. The design and working of fiscal policy demands an understanding of the effect of government purchases/expenditure of goods and services on household consumption. One potentially important means of influence is that government services and private consumption are inseparable in a Households utility function. The impact of the government activity depends upon whether it increases or decreases the marginal utility of private consumption (i.e., whether government purchases are Edgeworth complements or substitutes for private consumption).Following Modgiliani, an increase in government debt (Government debt defined, is money owed by the government. Government draws its income from the society) implies an increase in perceived household wealth which induces higher consumption and suppresses savings. The rise in consumption via the multiplier increases aggregate demand and interest rates and investment is thus crowded out. This line of reasoning hinges on the assumption that households perceive the rise in debt as an increase in their wealth.

The crowding out phenomenon mentioned above is one of the fundamental parts of Keynesian literature and is disputed by almost no one. It says that government deficit spending that is not backed up by an equivalent issue of new money carries with it an inherent need for the authority ( in this case the government) to issue debt that would compete with private financial instruments in the market. This would reduce private expenditures that are interest elastic due to increase in interest rates. This side effect in part offsets the originally intended expansionary effect of the increase in government expenditure.

Monetarists argue that the Keynesian textbook story ends too soon and cling to the view that fiscal policy is ineffective. The rationale behind this can be found by looking at a simple IS-LM model where th论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/10 页首页上一页1234567下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非