英语论文网

it does not exist in China, as China has a one party dominated political structure. As to prolocutor strategy, the consisting political tactics are almost the same between firms in China and in the West. The difference only lies in that political agencies are well developed in the west, and firms can hire professional lobbyists to act as prolocutors and lobby for them. While in China, the political agencies are under-developed. There are even no political agencies openly run in China, but there are still phenomena that some firms use other organization’s help to apply for governmental projects or build relations with government officials. The response from managers in our interviews indicates that, some offices of firms stationed in Beijing and capitals of provinces may evolve into quasi-political agencies. For institution innovation strategy, there is no big difference between firms in China and in the West. But in the period of transition, Chinese firms have more chances to use institution innovation strategies to promote the evolution of regulation rules and policies and to gain benefits in the process than firms in the West. As to information consultation strategy, there are no major differences between firms in China and in the West. Both Chinese and western firms can put forward opinions and suggestions from the viewpoint of firms or industries to government legislation and enforcement activities that will influence these firms or their industries. But western firms can also impact government decisions by reporting survey result of public opinion and provide testimony on some legislation. Such phenomenon has not been found in China. As to social forces mobilization strategy, some differences exist. Although firms in both China and the West can impact government decisions by mobilizing forces as social media, shareholders and other stakeholders, there are differences on manners and degrees. It is almost impossible for Chinese firms to mobilize the force of media, and neither they can bring pressure to bear on government decision-makers through mobilizing other social forces. While western firms can do so. Western firms can mobilize shareholders and employees to put pressures on government decision-makers. Further, they can affect the orientation of the public voice through impacting the medias firstly. They even can employ the force of federal court to protect their interests. 5 Conclusions China’s transition from a planned economy to a market economy with socialist characteristic provides Chinese domestic firms and transnational firms operating in China a complicated, dynamic and uncertain institutional environment. Though governments’ intervention role into firms business affaire has already been weakened under socialist market economy, there are still a certain gap in such respects as the market development, regulations and rules between a developing market environment in China and the ripe market economic environment in the West, and the government still intervenes into enterprises in many aspects. From this perspective, it shows the importance of the influence of corporate political strategy on government policy, when enterprises maintain the relationship with the government. Therefore, this paper studies the characteristics of corporate political strategies in Chinese business environment. All these are consistent with strategy management theory. Our research findings are helpful for academics and business pr本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。