英语论文网

1989), “appraisal” (Martin,2000; White, 1998; Martin& White, 2005).Martin (1997) firstly makes use of the item “appraisal”.Appraisal Theory is first officially introduced in Martin’s paper (2000) Beyond Exchange:APPRAISAL Systems in English after which it attract a worldwide attention.
............

Chapter Three Theoretical Framework.... 14
3.1 Interpersonal meaning......14
3.2 Appraisal Theory..... 15
3.2.1 Overview of Appraisal Theory.........15
3.2.2 The Framework of Appraisal Theory....... 16
3.3 Engagement Resource......19
3.3.1 Basic Concept of Engagement..........19
3.3.2 Monogloss vs. Heterogloss......20
3.3.3 Dialogic Expansion and Dialogic Contraction...........21
Chapter Four Methodology........28
4.1 Research Question............28
4.2 Data Collection........ 28
4.3 Research Instrument.........29
4.4 Research Approach...........29
4.5 Research Procedure.......... 30
Chapter Five Result and Discussion...........32
5.1 Frequencies of Engagement Resources in English Editorials......32
5.2 Analysis of Dialogic Contraction Resources......38
5.2.1 Disclaim......... 38
5.2.2 Proclaim......... 42
5.3 Analysis of Dialogic Expansion Resources........47

Chapter Five Result and Discussion

This chapter, as the core of the thesis, will presents the frequencies of the engagementresources in editorial by analyzing the statistics, and then conduct a detailed analysis ofdialogic contraction resources and dialogic expansion resources.

5.1 Frequencies of Engagement Resources in English Editorials

The corpus collected is processed by the linguistic software called UAM Corpus Tool,which calculates the frequencies the engagement resources according to which engagementresources are analyzed quantitatively. In order to be precise and reliable, two descriptive studyare adopted.Chapter Five Result and DiscussionThis chapter, as the core of the thesis, will presents the frequencies of the engagementresources in editorial by analyzing the statistics, and then conduct a detailed analysis ofdialogic contraction resources and dialogic expansion resources.5.1 Frequencies of Engagement Resources in English EditorialsThe corpus collected is processed by the linguistic software called UAM Corpus Tool,which calculates the frequencies the engagement resources according to which engagementresources are analyzed quantitatively. In order to be precise and reliable, two descriptive studyare adopted.Within the category of Dialogic Contraction, Disclaim (with 528 instances) taking up33.40 percent is nearly four times as much as Proclaim (with 140 instances) taking up 8.86percent in the whole system. As for the subcategory of Disclaim, counter outnumbers deny by6.84 percent, that is 20.12 percent (318 instances) to 13.28 percent (210 instances) in the wholesystem. As for the subcategory of Proclaim, three values together occupy 8.86 percent, amongwhich concur accounts for 0.95 percent with 15 instances, pronounce accounts for 5.38 percentwith 85 instances and endorse accounts for 2.53 percent with 40 instances in the whole system.Within the category of Dialogic Expansion, Entertain is a little bit higher than Attribute.Entertain makes up 29.60 percent with 468 instances and Attribute makes up 28.15 percentwith 445 instances in the whole system. In the s本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。