英语论文网

本研究是一项基于语料库的语用研究，重点放在学习者务实发展为代表的在尝新设备就业在中国英语专业学生跨四个学年的议论文。语用研究的基础上，它的目的是确定中国英语专业学生如何表达认知方式，认知设备的使用，以及如何随着时间的推移，这个能力开发参考母语数据，与学习者之间和可能的影响因素方面熟练的变化务实发展。此外，第二语言/外语教学的干预研究提供建议，并确定未来的研究领域。本章介绍的研究概述：为研究对象，研究目的和论文大纲的理由。The present study is a corpus-based interlanguage pragmatic research with a focus onlearners pragmatic development as represented in the employment of epistemic devices inthe Chinese English majors argumentative writings across the four academic years. On thebasis of interlanguage pragmatic studies, it aims to identify how Chinese English majorsexpress epistemic modality in the use of epistemic devices and how this competencedevelops over time with Reference to the native speaker data, with regard to proficiencyvariations among learners and possible factors affecting pragmatic development. Inaddition, the study offers suggestions for the second/foreign language instructionalintervention and identifies areas for future research. This chapter presents an overview ofthe study: the rationale for the study, the research purpose and the outline of thedissertation.

1.1Rationale for the studyInter
语言语（ILP）是最近探索分支学科的第二语言/外语（L2）的研究，已确定了由卡斯帕·施密特（1996）“的研究开发和使用的语言行动的战略由非母语”（150页）。然而，这是很常见的发现做过研究，在这个领域在很大程度上解决只是“使用”这个定义的一部分，而忽略了这一概念的习得成分。 ILP开发两股研究：比较社会语言学和习得。 ILP的研究，比较和社会语言学的研究主宰thefield的。比较研究已导致在一个显着的身体在四个主要领域的研究：（1）（2）第一语言描述（L1）的言语行为，（3）说明L2言语行为（尤其是先进的启发式任务，制定和完善非母语（NNSS）），（4）比较L1和L2的生产由本地和外来的扬声器（Bardivi Harlig，2002：184）。language pragmatics (ILP) is a more recently explored subdiscipline of second/foreign language (L2) research that has been defined by Kasper and Schmidt (1996) as“the study of the development and use of strategies for linguistic action by nonnativespeakers” (p.150). Nonetheless, it is very common to find that research ever done withinthis field largely addresses just the “use” part of this definition, neglecting the acquisitionalcomponent of this concept.ILP has developed two strands of research: comparative-sociolinguistic andacquisitional. In ILP research, the comparative and sociolinguistic studies dominate thefield. Comparative studies have resulted in a significant body of research in four main areas:(1) development and refinement of elicitation tasks, (2) description of first language (L1)speech acts, (3) description of L2 speech acts (especially by advanced non-native speakers(NNSs)), and (4) the comparison of L1 and L2 production by native and nonnative speakers(Bardivi-Harlig, 2002: 184). The comparisons serve a number of functions: as primaryresearch into L2 pragmatics, as a type of pragmatic error analysis, as a needs Assessmentfor the development of pedagogical methods and materials for teaching pragmatics, and amodel for pedagogical materials. They may also serve to define research areas foracquisitional ILP studies. This type of research, even without directly examining thedevelopment of pragmatic competence, has encouraged the generation of hypotheses aboutthe acquisition of pragmatic knowledge, which can later on be tested in developmenta studies.Recently, however, ILP has been influenced by developments in the field of secondlanguage acquisition (SLA) and second language pedagogy. In SLA, there is a growingrecognition of the importance of pragmatic competence within overall languagecompetence, and this has led to a heightened interest in how pragmatic knowledge isacquired and develops in second and foreign language learners. As 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。