the famous company Apple, it still took time and determination, and this determination sacrificed other choices, which could be the opportunity cost.
If a country wants to be prosperous and make its civilians lead a life of high quality and cooperate with its neighbor country in a peaceful way, they have to own a highly-operating leadership, which could make sensible decisions. One basic rule for the government can be reflected in the voting institution, whether by a one half majority or two thirds, which makes a struggle represent the majority people, kind of similar to Bentham utilitarian, which maintains that the interests of the majority outweigh that of the minority. But a country is a unity, and ignorance of the interests of the minority would easily trigger riots or parades. The mission of a government is try to reduce the opportunity cost of its each decision, that is why they are usually less strict with the minority in the process of implementation. For the decision could be regarded as discrimination for them there is no justification to sacrifice their interests in order to satisfy the majority, they become the opportunity cost of the decision. However, since the vested resources are finite, which can never meet the public demand, sacrifices must be made.
Politically, domestically, whether the country takes the republic institution or constitutional monarchy or even autocracy produces the opportunity cost. Diplomatically, when the neighbor has civil wars or has conflicts with the other neighbor or even with the country itself, what would it do? When several strategies are presented in front of it, any of the choice would create opportunity cost, namely, they have to lose some interests. Specifically speaking, if their neighbors have conflicts with each other, even though they claims they are neutral, the opportunity cost could be that the country miss a chance to set up close politician relationships with the other country, whose politician views are extremely close to its own.
Economically, when the country takes less measures to supervise the market and gives great space for the market itself, the so-called free market, which develops fast due to its principle of demands and providing, the opportunity cost would the planning economics, once taken by the Soviet Union, after the second the world war, which proved to be not as successful as free market, after all, it is still a kind of cost. Then when the government takes measures to control the monopoly to ensure the healthy environment of the country, the evil outcomes of the free market, they still have opportunity costs, which could be the resources used to make such a decision that could be use otherwise. As for international trade, the control of tariff also could have effects. Whether a country is open to the international market and whether the country prefers to satisfy its civilian demands itself are all worth careful consideration.
Culturally, should a country took protective view to its traditional culture discarded attitude to its own culture while welcome the foreign one, which could be the better one? Even if we find a solution that could protect both and hurt none, there still produce opportunity cost, the country could have use the efforts to do other things to serve the public. As we discussed above, the cost of education could be high, so the government may take steps to ensure its civilians’ educ
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。