英语论文网

Consumer Protection (Amendment) Bill 2010) amended in 2010 but still called the Consumer Protection Act 1999.
The Act in the formulation process, a direct reference to the "1987 Consumer Protection Act and the EU Product Liability Directive the contents of the legislation, including most of the content of the product liability with the EU Product Liability Directive.

 

Two product liability obligations main
2.1 China's main responsibility
Article 41 of the Tort Liability Act "to 142, the main obligations of our country's product liability is limited to two categories: direct obligations of the principal and indirect obligations of the principal.
2.1.1 direct obligations of the main
"Tort Liability Act provides products because of defects caused by loss of the fact that can produce two claims, the victim either to require producers to liability, liability can also be advocated to the seller, producers and sales both for the product direct obligations of the main responsibility on the victims bear true joint and several liability.
When victims seek compensation for defective products. The sole responsibility of its liability, no longer enjoy the right of recovery is a kind of ultimate responsibility for its commitment. However, if the object of the victims to claim compensation for defects generated independent of its other subjects again recover its commitment to an intermediate duty, the responsibility of a temporary nature.
2.1.2 indirect obligations of the main
The provisions of Article 44 of the Tort Liability Act "to make our products as a result of the fault of a third of the carrier, warehousing, and other defects, direct obligations of the principal liable for compensation, can the third party recovery.
Here should be understood more broadly, not limited to transporting, warehousing. Who does not belong to the producers, sellers responsible person at fault in the product defect, can be considered to be the third person. It is worth noting that the product components and raw materials in principle, should be regarded as a third person, but in some special cases should be the producer or seller, depending on components and raw material providers something to offer for the entire product independence and partition. Tire supplier tire, for example, as an integral part of the car, but its relative to the car with a certain degree of independence and partition, as soon as the tire reason lead to car defects, tire supplier together with the vehicle producers should be as producers, to assume the obligation to direct compensation.
2.2 Malaysia, the main responsibility
68, 1999 Consumer Protection Act clear that the consequences of the damage of the following four main product defects will be liable for compensation:
2.2.1 Products of producers
According to the interpretation of section 66 of the Consumer Protection Act of 1999, producers can be divided into the following three types: first, the manufacturer of the product; the second product acquisition and refining. If an item does not need to manufacture to use, so to obtain or extract of the substance will be regarded as the producer of the substance; the third for the processing of the product. If certain items do not need to manufacture, acquire or extract can be used, but the characteristics of the material needs of industrial or other processing, processors will be treated as a producer.
2.2.2 Product labeling by
A 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。