英语论文网

free from retaliation for filing a claim or complaint against an employer. And most of all, an employee also has the right to a safe workplace, free of dangerous conditions, toxic substances, and other potential safety hazards (FindLaw.com). The latter probably highlights a ground wherein Simpson and Brown can be assessed as to unnoticeably degrading their employee’s morale but at the same time, may have excluded themselves to be noted as a caring company, where commitment and loyalty is also a concern.

An account by Chris Megone and Simon Robinson has identified that any firm can face a lot of difficult choices. It is worth noting that the majority of business decisions do have an ethical content. Incidentally, there has always seemed to be a problem over how you fit this subject of business ethics into a business course, because there should not be a separate compartment for ethics options that you can take or disregard, treating it as quite unrelated to everything else that is happening within the business course. It is really a thread which runs through all the functions and all the aspects of a business. For example, financial decisions might seem the most securely based on arithmetic and rules. Yet financial decisions very often require you to make some decision as between profit now and profit in the future, and to do that you have to give some weighting to the interests involved here and now, and to those in the future, so you end up with an ethical dimension to the decision. One kind of decision to which I will refer has to be made in situations where there seem to be competing values, not cases where one course is clearly right, the other wrong. You may decide to do the wrong thing. That is entirely another matter, but in that case there need be no query in your own mind as to which course is right and which course is wrong. The difficulties come when in fact both courses seem right and we have to decide which of them is going to prevail (11). The description has profoundly explain it all that decision making in a corporate manner cannot be easily justified but at the same time, the weight between right and wrong, who benefits the most and what long-term benefit can it truly offer. In the first place, Simpson and Brown, and even the rest of the asbestos-user companies, have already acknowledge the danger it contains. They are already equipped with the knowledge that asbestos contain elements that are considerably hazardous to one’s health; and have even specifically noted asbestosis, a chronic lung infection and at the same time related with mesethelioma, understood as a cancer of the chest lining. As said, various studies have already been conducted as early as 1932—where in fact, the industry already knew the hazards of asbestos 60 years ago, and the time frame is of huge advantage to determine the costs.

The setting up of research studies from the very beginning could have been of great use to look for possible alternative breakthroughs in replacement of asbestos. This would have been a major act for asbestos companies taking into account the possible prospects for the future benefit of their own industry and at the same time the human and environment factors. This major ground for criticism shall have prospered the financing decision making with the valuable ethics that come along with.

Does Dr. Smith’s explanation for conce本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。