司法公平正义:控辩双方庭审语篇的批评话语分析 [2]
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2017-05-21编辑:lgg点击率:4719
论文字数:38547论文编号:org201705172125113795语种:中文 Chinese地区:中国价格:$ 33
关键词:英语毕业论文批评话语分析法庭语篇吴英案
摘要:本文是英语毕业论文,为了尊重公诉人和被告人在法庭上如何履行其目的,以及他们如何不能恰当地陈述自己的论点,本研究从语篇转录的语言学分析入手。然后作者将语境考虑进去,探讨了为什么双方通过分析语境的原因而呈现出不同的语言行为。
n used to discover the linguistic advantage of both sides in the cross-examination. In Wang Zhenhua’ study on the Simpson Case (2008), he discovered the interpersonal relation expressed during cross-examination. Based on the author’s analysis, it is concluded that objective speech with a positive attitude made the speaker stand on a rather advantageous position. On the opposite, subjective speech with an unclear attitude made the speaker stand on a less advantageous position. Systemic-Functional is also a method employed for the analysis of features of English in court debate. Gong Jing’s study took clause as its major unit for analysis, discussing the types of process of verbs as well as lexical choices employed in the transitivity processes (2005). Findings in this study summarized how the ideational functions are realized through the processes and lexical choices. Studies have also been conducted focusing on the realization of persuasive reasoning in courtroom discourse from the perspective of transaction-oriented information processing. Du Jinbang tagged the data from CLIPS to see the distribution pattern of transaction-oriented information in courtroom discourses (2010). Elaboration was conducted on the pattern of information distribution, the linguistic realization of transaction-oriented information and its function and attitudes expressed in information processing. The author believes that proper use of transaction-oriented information can improve the effects of persuasive reasoning.
.........
2.2 Overseas Researches on This Study
The influence imposed by attorney varied with the pattern of questioning. The pattern of questioning showed the character of forcible typology. A specific questioning pattern would lead to a particular response, which is of coerciveness. For example, a declarative question such as tag question (it is you who did this, isn’t it?) is of the strongest coerciveness (meaning strictly limited the possibility of witness’s acceptable response, even pointed out the response), however an open-ended wh-question, such as who, what, where, when and why showed rather light sight of coerciveness. Here what Danet (see Berk-Seligson, 1990) and his colleague chose as the metric to measure the strength of coerciveness is the length of the response. The more coercive is the question, the shorter the response is offered by the witness. A strongly coercive question such as a tag question tended to generate a “yes/no” response, which normally is rather short, while an open-ended wh-question frequently leaded to a rather long response, which is of long sentence or several sentences combined as a narrative discourse.
........
CHAPTER THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK .... 12
3.1 An Overview of Critical Discourse Analysis ...... 12
3.2 Fairclough’s Three-Dimension Framework for Discourse Analysis ....... 13
3.3 Analytical Framework .... 19
CHAPTER FOUR ATTITUDES EXPRESSED BY PROSECUTOR AND DEFENDANT TOWARDS...... 20
本
论文由
英语论文网提供整理,提供
论文代写,
英语论文代写,
代写论文,
代写英语论文,
代写留学生论文,
代写英文论文,
留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。