英语论文网

support the arguments. Literature supports the discussion which has been developed from the information collected. The work will be soundly argued and the conclusions will be largely convincing C – A range of appropriate points made but more as a list then as a unified piece of work. ‘Reader presented with bricks rather than building’. The work will be reasonably argued but the conclusions will not be entirely convincing Secondary sources will usually provided to support the points made D – A limited number of points made with little attempt to interrelate them to form a coherent discussion. Poorly argued with rather unconvincing conclusions. The reader may well doubt that the conclusions are valid .Poor use of any external data to support the points. E – Some evidence of an attempt to provide an answer to the question but insufficient detail to pass. No real attempt to move on from a few pieces of information. Poorly argued and with conclusions that just do not follow from the evidence presented ‘Chunking’ calls into question the student’s in depth understanding of the issues presented.. F - A random collection of statements based on the students own point of view with no attempt to use evidence to support the arguments. Alternatively, serious ‘chunking’. Evaluation • Should be able to independently evaluate current research, advanced scholarship and associated methodologies and appropriately justify the work of self and others A small group of students complained that they needed more time because of the mass of information available so under this heading the ability to recognise worthwhile and less valuable information should be included. A - The answer demonstrates the ability to deal with data from a wide variety of sources with a clear understanding of its relative value. There is clear evidence of the student’s ability to critically evaluate ideas and sources. Referencing is full and accurate B- A good range of literature used from a broad range of sources. The answer demonstrates appreciation of its appropriateness. Full and accurate referencing C- Some evidence of critical evaluation of secondary data. Correct referencing for the most part D- Indiscriminate use of (probably) very limited information. Poor referencing E – Some attempt to use secondary data. No attempt at appraising its reliability. Poor referencing F –Very little or no use of published work. Poorly referenced if at all Generic skills outcomes Although the generic skills will to some extent be obvious in the output of the business report they should also emerge from the reflective essay. Needs analysis • Should be able to explore the demands of a task and formulate viable proposals for meeting these demands A – an excellent answer will demonstrate a comprehensive consideration of the issues and configure the response to enable different arguments to be presented in a logical order. B – a good answer will structure the problem in a logical way demonstrating a breadth of understanding of the issues C- an average answer will show consideration of some of the issues in a reasonably coherent way D – a poor response will take a very narrow view and consider a limited range of issues E- a referral answer will not consider the issues posed in the question in a coherent or detailed way, F - a failing answer will not demonstrate an understanding of the issues posed in the qu